Comparative Analysis of Mean Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Versus Without Nephrostomy Tube

Comparison of Hospital Stay in PCNL With and Without Nephrostomy Tube

Authors

  • Izhar Ali Consultant Urologist, Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Ijaz Khan Consultant Urologist, District Headquarters Teaching Hospital, Swabi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
  • Aziz ul Wahab Consultant Urologist, District Headquarters Hospital Demerara, Lower Dir, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
  • Farman Ullah Consultant Urologist, Gomal Medical College, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Tanveer Sajid Consultant Urologist, Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Numan Alam Consultant Urologist, District Headquarters Hospital, Mardan, Pakistan
  • Rafiq Zafar Consultant Urologist, Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1635

Keywords:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, tubeless PCNL, nephrostomy tube, hospital stay, renal calculi, minimally invasive urology.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure for the removal of large renal calculi. The use of nephrostomy tubes postoperatively is common; however, they may increase hospital stay and patient discomfort. Tubeless PCNL has emerged as a potential alternative.
Objective: To compare the mean hospital stay in patients undergoing PCNL with and without a nephrostomy tube.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing PCNL at the Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi, from June to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (PCNL with nephrostomy tube) and Group B (tubeless PCNL). Both groups were assessed for mean hospital stay, postoperative complications, and stone size using SPSS version 25. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, stone size of 2-3 cm, and ASA I-II. Exclusion criteria included prior renal surgeries and comorbidities.
Results: The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group B (1.90 ± 0.80 days) compared to Group A (2.46 ± 0.81 days, p=0.0001).
Conclusion: Tubeless PCNL significantly reduces hospital stay compared to standard PCNL.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Salem SM, Sultan MF, Badawy A. Oral Dissolution Therapy for Renal Radiolucent Stones: Outcome and Factors Affecting Response. Urology Annals. 2019;11(4):369-73.

Iqbal N, Hasan A, Siddiqui FS, Iftikhar F, Ilyas SM, Hussain I, et al. Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Pre-School and School-Age Children: Single Center Experience. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad-Pakistan. 2019;31(3):455-60.

Patel SR, Nakada SY. The Modern History and Evolution of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology. 2015;29(2):153-7.

Iqbal N, Assad S, Hussain I, Hassan Y, Khan H, Farooq MA, et al. Comparison of Outcomes of Tubed Versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children: A Single Center Study. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2018;44(1):56-61.

Ichaoui H, Samet A, Hadjalouane HB, Hermi A, Hedhli H, Bakir MA, et al. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Standard Technique Versus Tubeless - 125 Procedures. Cureus. 2019;11(3).

Moosanejad N, Firouzian A, Hashemi SA, Bahari M, Fazli M. Comparison of Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones: A Randomized, Clinical Trial. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2016;49(4).

Wathigo FK, Hayombe A, Maina D. Urolithiasis Analysis in a Multiethnic Population at a Tertiary Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Research Notes. 2017;10(1):158.

Villa L, Giusti G, Knoll T, Traxer O. Imaging for Urinary Stones: Update in 2015. European Urology Focus. 2016;2(2):122-9.

Shahnani PS, Karami M, Astane B, Janghorbani M. The Comparative Survey of Hounsfield Units of Stone Composition in Urolithiasis Patients. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2014;19(7):650-3.

Aboutaleb MH, El-Shazly MA. Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Calculi. Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research. 2016;2(1):15.

Mandhani A, Goyal R, Vijjan V, Dubey D, Kapoor R. Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy – Should a Stent Be an Integral Part? Journal of Urology. 2007;178(3 Pt 1):921-4.

Shen P, Liu Y, Wang J. Nephrostomy Tube-Free Versus Nephrostomy Tube for Renal Drainage After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urologia Internationalis. 2012;88(3):298-306.

Karami H, Jabbari M, Arbab AH. Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: 5 Years of Experience in 201 Patients. Journal of Endourology. 2007;21(11):1411-3.

Agrawal MS, Agrawal M, Gupta A, Bansal S, Yadav A, Goyal J. A Randomized Comparison of Tubeless and Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology. 2008;22(3):439-42.

Karami H, Gholamrezaie HR. Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Selected Patients. Journal of Endourology. 2004;18(5):475-6.

Limb J, Bellman GC. Tubeless Percutaneous Renal Surgery: Review of First 112 Patients. Urology. 2002;59(4):527-31.

Borges CF, Fregonesi A, Silva DC, Sasse AD. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nephrostomy Placement Versus Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology. 2010;24(11):1739-46.

Abbott JE, Deem SG, Mosley N, Tan G, Kumar N, Davalos JG. Are We Fearful of Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? Assessing the Need for Tube Drainage Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Urology Annals. 2016;8(1):70-5

Downloads

Published

2024-09-27

How to Cite

Izhar Ali, Ijaz Khan, Aziz ul Wahab, Farman Ullah, Muhammad Tanveer Sajid, Numan Alam, & Rafiq Zafar. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Mean Hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) With Versus Without Nephrostomy Tube: Comparison of Hospital Stay in PCNL With and Without Nephrostomy Tube. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 4(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1635