Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Versus Bobath Approach to Improve Upper Limb Motor Function Among Stroke Survivors

CIMT vs Bobath in Stroke Survivors' Motor Function

Authors

  • Muhammad Danial Baig Chughtai United College of Physical Therapy, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Sidra Ghias Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Hifza Riaz Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Gohar Rehman College of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (CPM&R), Peshawar, Pakistan
  • Rabbia Kamray Lahore Institute of Science & Technology Affiliated with Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Hanan Azfar Consultant Physiotherapist, Medline Healthcare, Gujranwala, Pakistan
  • Muqadas Majeed The University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Arslan Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Intsam Aslam PSRD College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1553

Keywords:

Stroke rehabilitation, CIMT, Bobath approach, upper limb motor function, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory, randomized clinical trial.

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of disability globally, with upper limb motor deficits significantly affecting the quality of life of survivors. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) and the Bobath approach are two commonly used rehabilitation techniques aimed at improving upper limb function post-stroke.
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of CIMT versus the Bobath approach in improving upper limb motor function among stroke survivors.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 26 stroke patients aged 50-70 years, recruited from National Hospital Lahore, Jinnah Hospital Lahore, and home-based sessions. Patients were randomly assigned to either the CIMT group (n=13) or the Bobath group (n=13), and interventions were administered for four sessions per week over eight weeks. Upper limb motor function was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) and the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.
Results: Post-intervention, the CIMT group showed significantly greater improvements in FMA-UE scores (56.90 ± 3.39) compared to the Bobath group (53.68 ± 2.10, p<0.001). CAHAI scores also favored CIMT (70.77 ± 2.88) over the Bobath approach (69.31 ± 3.14, p=0.021).
Conclusion: Both interventions improved upper limb function, but CIMT was more effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbasi MA, Sammo J, Sheikh M. Incidence of Stroke in Context of Hypertension in Local Population. Pakistan Journal of Physiology. 2007;3(2):52-54.

Khealani BA, Hameed B, Mapari UU. Stroke in Pakistan. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2008;58(7):400-403.

Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D, et al. Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Extremity Function 3 to 9 Months After Stroke: The EXCITE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2006;296(17):2095-2104.

Willmore EG, Millar NL, van der Windt D. Post-Surgical Physiotherapy in Frozen Shoulder: A Review. Shoulder & Elbow. 2022;14(4):438-451.

Alon G, Levitt AF, McCarthy PA. Functional Electrical Stimulation Enhancement of Upper Extremity Functional Recovery During Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2007;21(3):207-215.

Grotta JC, Noser EA, Ro T, Boake C, Levin H, Aronowski J, et al. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy. Stroke. 2004;35(11 Suppl 1):2699-2701.

Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EE, Wolf SL. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy After Stroke. The Lancet Neurology. 2015;14(2):224-234.

Wang D, Xiang J, He Y, Yuan M, Dong L, Ye Z, et al. The Mechanism and Clinical Application of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2022;16:828599.

Pumprasart T, Pramodhyakul N, Piriyaprasarth P. The Effect of the Bobath Therapy Programme on Upper Limb and Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Individuals With Moderate to Severe Deficits. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2019;26(10):1-12.

Champion J, Barber C, Lynch-Ellerington M. Recovery of Upper Limb Function. Bobath Concept. 2009;154.

Wattchow KA, McDonnell MN, Hillier SL. Rehabilitation Interventions for Upper Limb Function in the First Four Weeks Following Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Evidence. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2018;99(2):367-382.

Nasb M, Li Z, Youssef ASA, Dayoub L, Chen H. Comparison of the Effects of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Intensive Conventional Therapy With a Botulinum-A Toxin Injection on Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery in Patients With Stroke. Libyan Journal of Medicine. 2019;14(1):1609304.

Huseyinsinoglu BE, Ozdincler AR, Krespi Y. Bobath Concept Versus Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy to Improve Arm Functional Recovery in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2012;26(8):705-715.

Sütçü G, Özçakar L, Yalçın Aİ, Kılınç M. Bobath vs. Task-Oriented Training After Stroke: An Assessor-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Brain Injury. 2023;37(7):581-587.

Brock KA, Luke C, Tillyard J, Simondson J, Black S. Improving Directional Control of the Upper Limb in Severe Stroke: Efficacy of the Bobath Concept: A Pilot Randomised Trial. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 2022;50(3):117-125.

Dorsch S, Carling C, Cao Z, Fanayan E, Graham PL, McCluskey A, et al. Bobath Therapy is Inferior to Task-Specific Training and Not Superior to Other Interventions in Improving Arm Activity and Arm Strength Outcomes After Stroke: A Systematic Review. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2023;69(1):15-22.

Rocha LSO, Gama GCB, Rocha RSB, de Barros Rocha L, Dias CP, Santos LLS, et al. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Increases Functionality and Quality of Life After Stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2021;30(6):105774.

Hakkennes S, Keating JL. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Following Stroke: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2005;51(4):221-231.

Abba M, Muhammad A, Badaru U, Abdullahi A. Comparative Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Upper Limb Function of Chronic Stroke Survivors. Physiotherapy Quarterly. 2020;28(1):1-5.

Hanphode MN, Varadharajulu G, Kanase S. The Effectiveness of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Placing Technique of Bobath on Upper Limb Function in Hemiparetic Individual. Scopus IJPHRD Citation Score. 2019;10(7):25-32.

Batool S, Soomro N, Amjad F, Fauz R. To Compare the Effectiveness of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Versus Motor Relearning Programme to Improve Motor Function of Hemiplegic Upper Extremity After Stroke. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;31(5):1167-1172.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-27

How to Cite

Muhammad Danial Baig Chughtai, Sidra Ghias, Hifza Riaz, Gohar Rehman, Rabbia Kamray, Hanan Azfar, Muqadas Majeed, Muhammad Arslan, & Aslam, I. (2024). Effect of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Versus Bobath Approach to Improve Upper Limb Motor Function Among Stroke Survivors: CIMT vs Bobath in Stroke Survivors’ Motor Function. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 4(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i3.1553

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): Volume 4, Issue 3 - July to September 2024

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Danial Baig Chughtai, Sidra Ghias, Hifza Riaz, Gohar Rehman, Rabbia Kamray, Hanan Azfar, Muqadas Majeed, Muhammad Arslan, Intsam Aslam

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >>