Documentation for Orthopaedic Surgery: An Audit to Ensure Compliance with the Most Recent Guidelines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.688Keywords:
Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Documentation, Clinical Audit, RCS Guidelines, Compliance, Aide-Memoir, Electronic Health Records, Quality Improvement, Patient Care, Medical LegalAbstract
Background: Consistent and thorough documentation in orthopaedic surgery is critical for ensuring quality patient care and protecting the legal interests of surgeons. Adherence to the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) guidelines is fundamental to achieving this. However, studies have identified a persistent deficiency in compliance with these guidelines across various surgical specialities.
Objective: The audit aimed to evaluate the existing compliance of orthopaedic surgical documentation with RCS guidelines at Dr. Ziauddin Hospital and to implement a tool to improve documentation practices.
Methods: A closed-loop, two-cycle audit was conducted. The first cycle retrospectively analysed 200 surgical notes from January to July 2023, using a standardized operation sheet to assess compliance with RCS guidelines. Identified deficiencies were addressed by introducing an aide-memoir in all orthopaedic operating rooms. The second cycle prospectively analysed 100 surgical notes from August to October 2023 to evaluate the impact of the intervention.
Results: The initial audit revealed a 0% compliance rate in documenting the date, time, and type of surgery (elective or emergency). Following interventions, the second cycle showed significant improvements, with compliance rates rising to 100% for date and time, and to 87% for identifying the surgery type. Additional documentation parameters such as the recording of the assistant's name and incision details also improved, though exact numerical increases were not specified.
Conclusion: Introducing an aide-memoir significantly enhanced compliance with RCS surgical documentation guidelines. This simple, effective tool facilitated a remarkable improvement in the quality of operative notes, underscoring the need for regular audits and potential integration of electronic documentation systems.
Downloads
References
Davoudi S, Dooling J, Glondys B, Jones T, Kadlec L, Overgaard S, et al. Data Quality Management Model (Updated). Journal of AHIMA. 2015;86:62-5.
Moor M, Banerjee O, Abad ZSH, Krumholz HM, Leskovec J, Topol EJ, et al. Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature. 2023;616(7956):259-65.
Putnam W, Burge FI, Lawson B, Cox JL, Sketris I, Flowerdew G, et al. Evidence-based cardiovascular care in the community: A population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Family Practice. 2004;5(1):6.
Kreetapirom P, Jaruratanasirikul S, Pruphetkaew N. Audit of paediatric residents' medical records. Clin Teach. 2017;14(3):189-94.
Nasim O, Durrani A, Eskander B, Pantelias C, Gallagher K. A Clinical Audit of Orthopaedic Operation Note Documentation and Digitalization of the Operative Note Template: A Quality Improvement Project. Cureus. 2022;14(12):e33171.
Sneddon F, Fritsch N, Mackenzie S, Skipsey D, Rankin I. Orthopaedic surgical documentation: pre-templated operation notes significantly improve documentation of surgical procedures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2023;18(1):48.
Sneddon F, Fritsch N, Mackenzie S, Skipsey D, Rankin IA. Orthopaedic surgical documentation: pre-templated operation notes significantly improve documentation of surgical procedures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2023;18(1):48.
Assessing the quality of operation notes: a review of 1092 operation notes in 9 UK hospitals. Patient Saf Surg. 2016;10:5.
Oyekan AA, Lee JY, Hodges JC, Chen SR, Wilson AE, Fourman MS, et al. Increasing Quality and Frequency of Goals-of-Care Documentation in the Highest-Risk Surgical Candidates: One-Year Results of the Surgical Pause Program. JBJS Open Access. 2023;8(2):e22.
Kakkar R. Acta Scientific Orthopaedics (ISSN: 2581-8635) An Audit of Orthopaedic Surgery Notes: Where Do We Stand Today? Acta Scientific Orthopaedics. 2022;6:136-9.
Vrettos B. Communicate, collaborate and document: the pillars to avoid and manage complaints. South African Orthopaedic Journal. 2023;22(1):6-8.
Tavabi N, Singh M, Pruneski J, Kiapour AM. Systematic evaluation of common natural language processing techniques to codify clinical notes. Plos one. 2024;19(3):e0298892.
Mustafa MKE, Khairy AMM, Ahmed ABE. Assessing the Quality of Orthopaedic Operation Notes in Accordance With the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines: An Audit Cycle. Cureus. 2020;12(8):e9707.
Dyke R, St-John E, Shah H, Walker J, Loughran D, Anakwe R, et al. Comparing shared decision making using a paper and digital consent process. A multi-site, single centre study in a trauma and orthopaedic department. The Surgeon. 2023;21(4):235-41.
Tavabi N, Pruneski J, Golchin S, Singh M, Sanborn R, Heyworth B, et al. Building large-scale registries from unstructured clinical notes using a low-resource natural language processing pipeline. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 2024:102847.
Coughlan F, Ellanti P, Ní Fhoghlu C, Moriarity A, Hogan N. Audit of Orthopaedic Surgical Documentation. Surgery Research and Practice. 2015;2015:782720.
Javid M, Swaminathan S, Jebasingh A, Velayutham M, Mani R. A prospective closed loop audit on the quality of the operative notes in a general surgical unit in a quaternary care centre. International Surgery Journal. 2020;7.
Shayah A, Agada FO, Gunasekaran S, Jassar P, England RJ. The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61(4):677-9.
Sweed TA, Bonajmah AA, Mussa MA. Audit of operation notes in an orthopaedic unit. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014;22(2):218-20.
Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Labricciosa FM, Al Omari AH, Bains L, Baraket O, et al. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a proposal for a global evidence-based bundle. Antibiotics. 2024;13(1):100.
Letica‐Kriegel AS, Rosen R, McNeil N, Thompson E, James M, Broach V, et al. Development and perception of surgery‐specific goals of care discussions in the preoperative setting: A learning pilot. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yameena Noman Khan, Ali Mala, Shahbaz Khan Panhwer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Public Licensing Terms
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license:
- You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use.
- Attribution must be given to the original author(s) and source in a manner that is reasonable and does not imply endorsement.
- No additional restrictions may be applied that conflict with the terms of this license.
For more details, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
