Effect of Personalized Complementary Feeding Counseling Combined with Routine Child Health Care on Growth and Developmental Outcomes in Infants

Authors

  • Mubashra Tariq Dimensions: Institute for Autism, Special Education, Physical Rehabilitation & Psychological Services, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ayesha Nazir Hashmi Dimensions: Institute for Autism, Special Education, Physical Rehabilitation & Psychological Services, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Fariha Asghar University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v6i9.2047

Keywords:

complementary feeding; infant nutrition; growth; child development; nutrition counseling; child health care.

Abstract

Background: Appropriate complementary feeding during infancy is essential for physical growth and developmental progression. Generalized feeding advice may not adequately address differences in infant nutritional requirements, feeding practices, and caregiver circumstances. Objective: To evaluate the effect of personalized complementary feeding counseling combined with routine child health care on growth and developmental outcomes in infants. Methods: A prospective controlled interventional study included 46 infants attending Dimensions: Institute for Autism, Special Education, Physical Rehabilitation & Psychological Services, Lahore, Pakistan. The intervention group (n=23) received individualized complementary feeding counseling alongside routine child health care, whereas the control group (n=23) received routine care alone. Anthropometric measurements and developmental outcomes were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0, with baseline-adjusted comparisons where appropriate. Results: Mean weight increased by 1.29 kg in the intervention group compared with 0.79 kg in the control group. Adjusted between-group differences favored the intervention for weight (0.49 kg; 95% CI 0.18–0.80; p=0.003), recumbent length (1.43 cm; 95% CI 0.39–2.47; p=0.008), and head circumference (0.48 cm; 95% CI 0.09–0.87; p=0.017). Greater improvements were also observed across gross motor, fine motor, communication, cognitive, and personal-social developmental domains. The adjusted difference in total developmental score was 20.8 points (95% CI 11.4–30.2; p<0.001). Conclusion: Personalized complementary feeding counseling integrated into routine child health care was associated with more favorable anthropometric and developmental outcomes than routine care alone. Further controlled investigations are required to establish the reproducibility and longer-term clinical significance of these findings

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. WHO guideline for complementary feeding of infants and young children 6–23 months of age. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

United Nations Children's Fund. Improving young children's diets during the complementary feeding period: UNICEF programming guidance. New York: UNICEF; 2020.

Lutter CK, Grummer-Strawn LM, Rogers LM. Complementary feeding of infants and young children 6 to 23 months of age. Nutr Rev. 2021;79(8):825-846. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuaa143.

Pérez-Escamilla R, Jimenez EY, Dewey KG. Responsive feeding recommendations: harmonizing integration into dietary guidelines for infants and young children. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021;5(6). doi:10.1093/cdn/nzab076.

Zaman S, Ashraf RN, Martines J. Training in complementary feeding counselling of healthcare workers and its influence on maternal behaviours and child growth: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Lahore, Pakistan. J Health Popul Nutr. 2008;26(2):210-222. doi:10.3329/jhpn.v26i2.594.

Saleem AF, Mahmud S, Baig-Ansari N, Zaidi AKM. Impact of maternal education about complementary feeding on their infants' nutritional outcomes in low- and middle-income households: a community-based randomized interventional study in Karachi, Pakistan. J Health Popul Nutr. 2014;32(4):623-633.

Manikam L, Sharmila A, Dharmaratnam A, Alexander EC, Kuah JY, Prasad A, et al. Systematic review of infant and young child complementary feeding practices in South Asian families: the Pakistan perspective. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(4):655-668. doi:10.1017/S1368980017002956.

Arikpo D, Edet ES, Chibuzor MT, Odey F, Caldwell DM. Educational interventions for improving primary caregiver complementary feeding practices for children aged 24 months and under. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011768.pub2.

English LK, Obbagy JE, Wong YP, Butte NF, Dewey KG, Fox MK, et al. Complementary feeding and developmental milestones: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109(Suppl 7):879S-889S. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy321.

Aboud FE, Moore AC, Akhter S. Effectiveness of a community-based responsive feeding programme in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomized field trial. Matern Child Nutr. 2008;4(4):275-286. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00146.x.

Aboud FE, Shafique S, Akhter S. A responsive feeding intervention increases children's self-feeding and maternal responsiveness but not weight gain. J Nutr. 2009;139(9):1738-1743. doi:10.3945/jn.109.104885.

Aboud FE, Akhter S. A cluster-randomized evaluation of a responsive stimulation and feeding intervention in Bangladesh. Pediatrics. 2011;127(5). doi:10.1542/peds.2010-2160.

Bhandari N, Bahl R, Nayyar B, Khokhar P, Rohde JE, Bhan MK. Food supplementation with encouragement to feed it to infants from 4 to 12 months of age has a small impact on weight gain. J Nutr. 2001;131(7):1946-1951.

Taylor RW, Williams SM, Fangupo LJ, Wheeler BJ, Taylor BJ, Daniels L, et al. Effect of a baby-led approach to complementary feeding on infant growth and overweight: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(9):838-846. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1284.

Yousafzai AK, Rasheed MA, Rizvi A, Armstrong R, Bhutta ZA. Effect of integrated responsive stimulation and nutrition interventions in the Lady Health Worker programme in Pakistan on child development, growth, and health outcomes: a cluster-randomised factorial effectiveness trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9950):1282-1293. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60455-4.

Yousafzai AK, Obradović J, Rasheed MA, Rizvi A, Portilla XA, Tirado-Strayer N, et al. Effects of responsive stimulation and nutrition interventions on children's development and growth at age 4 years in a disadvantaged population in Pakistan: a longitudinal follow-up of a cluster-randomised factorial effectiveness trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(8). doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30100-0.

Zhang Y, Wu Q, Wang W, van Velthoven MH, Chang S, Han H, et al. Effectiveness of complementary food supplements and dietary counselling on anaemia and stunting in children aged 6–23 months in poor areas of Qinghai Province, China: a controlled interventional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011234.

Rahman A, Bhuiyan MB, Das SK. Effect of short-term educational intervention on complementary feeding index among infants in rural Bangladesh: a randomized control trial. BMC Nutr. 2022;8(1):73. doi:10.1186/s40795-022-00565-0.

Has EMM, Nursalam, Arief YS. Improving complementary feeding practice and child growth in Indonesia through family empowerment intervention. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(Suppl 2). doi:10.47391/JPMA.Ind-S2-2.

Di Prete A, Galloway AT, Farrow C, Bellagamba F, Addessi E. A systematic review of the relation between complementary feeding and children's development. Curr Nutr Rep. 2025;14(1):104. doi:10.1007/s13668-025-00692-7.

Prado EL, Dewey KG. Nutrition and brain development in early life. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(4):267-284. doi:10.1111/nure.12102.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Mubashra Tariq, Ayesha Nazir Hashmi, & Fariha Asghar. (2026). Effect of Personalized Complementary Feeding Counseling Combined with Routine Child Health Care on Growth and Developmental Outcomes in Infants. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 6(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v6i9.2047

Most read articles by the same author(s)