Teaching Anatomy in Rehabilitation Sciences: Perceptions of Undergraduate Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Sports Sciences Students of Ziauddin University, Pakistan

Main Article Content

Fatima Hamza
Kiran Yameen
Mahnoor Khursheed
Saiqa Jalil
Areeba Khan

Abstract

Background: Anatomy education serves as a cornerstone in the curriculum of rehabilitation sciences, encompassing physical therapy, occupational therapy, and sports sciences. The complexity of teaching and understanding human anatomy necessitates diverse pedagogical approaches to effectively prepare students for clinical practice. Recent trends emphasize the integration of clinical relevance and practical experience into anatomy education, reflecting the evolving needs of healthcare education.


Objective: This study aimed to explore the perceptions of undergraduate students from various rehabilitation science programs at Ziauddin University, Pakistan, regarding their anatomy education. It sought to identify the challenges faced by students, evaluate the effectiveness of current teaching methodologies, and assess the integration of theoretical knowledge with clinical practice.


Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted over six months, from January to June 2023, involving 120 students from the Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT), Doctor of Occupational Therapy (DOT), and Bachelor of Physical Education Health and Sports Sciences (BPEHSS) programs. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms, assessing demographics, satisfaction with anatomy lectures, exposure to practical sessions, and perceptions of the relevance of anatomy to clinical practice. The analysis utilized SPSS version 25, presenting results in frequencies and percentages.


Results: Among the participants, 52.8% were aged 17-20, and 79.2% were female. The majority (83.2%) were in their preclinical years. A total of 66.4% expressed satisfaction with the duration of anatomy lectures, while practical sessions were attended by 52.8%. Challenges identified included the vast curriculum covered in a short time (79%), and a strong preference (83.2%) for physiotherapists trained as anatomists to teach anatomy. The relevance of anatomy to clinical performance was highly rated, with 63.9% recognizing its high relevance.


Conclusion: The study highlights the need for anatomy education in rehabilitation sciences to adapt to the demands of clinical relevance and practical application. Incorporating trained physiotherapists as instructors and increasing the focus on practical sessions could enhance students' learning experiences and preparation for clinical practice.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hamza, F., Yameen, K., Khursheed, M., Jalil, S., & Khan, A. (2024). Teaching Anatomy in Rehabilitation Sciences: Perceptions of Undergraduate Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Sports Sciences Students of Ziauddin University, Pakistan. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 4(1), 394–399. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.402
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Fatima Hamza, Ziauddin University Karachi Pakistan.

Sr. Lecturer, Ziauddin College of Physical therapy, Faculty of Allied health Sciences.

Kiran Yameen, Ziauddin University Karachi Pakistan.

Sr. Lecturer, Ziauddin College of Physical therapy, Faculty of Allied health Sciences.

Mahnoor Khursheed, Ziauddin University Karachi Pakistan.

Sr. Lecturer, Ziauddin College of Physical therapy, Faculty of Allied health Sciences.

Saiqa Jalil, Ziauddin University Karachi Pakistan.

Sr. Lecturer, Ziauddin College of Physical therapy, Faculty of Allied health Sciences.

Areeba Khan, Ziauddin University Karachi Pakistan.

Sr. Lecturer, Ziauddin College of Physical therapy, Faculty of Allied health Sciences.

References

Kirylo JD. The thoughtful teacher: Making connections with a diverse student population. Rowman & Littlefield; 2021 Apr 15.

Chan LK, Pawlina W. Teaching Anatomy. A Practical Guide. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 2015.

Standring S, editor. Gray's anatomy e-book: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021 May 22.

Wilson E. A system of human anatomy. BoD–Books on Demand; 2022 Oct 24.

Clifton W, Damon A, Nottmeier E, Pichelmann M. The importance of teaching clinical anatomy in surgical skills education: Spare the patient, use a sim!. Clinical Anatomy. 2020 Jan;33(1):124-7.

Ardern CL, Büttner F, Andrade R, Weir A, Ashe MC, Holden S, Impellizzeri FM, Delahunt E, Dijkstra HP, Mathieson S, Rathleff MS. Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance. British journal of sports medicine. 2021 Oct 7.

Simons AC, McHugh KM, Appling S, Harris SL, Burgoon JM. Instructional approaches: Anatomy education of physical therapists. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2022 Jan;15(1):102-14.

Yohannan DG, Oommen AM, Bhaskaran Jayaprasad A, Raju NK, Suresh RO, Nair SJ. “Air anatomy”–teaching complex spatial anatomy using simple hand gestures. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2022 May;15(3):552-65.

Zargaran A, Turki MA, Bhaskar J, Spiers HV, Zargaran D. The role of technology in anatomy teaching: striking the right balance. Advances in medical education and practice. 2020 Mar 31:259-66.

Smith CF, Finn GM, Holland J, Stewart J, Connolly SA, Hennessy CM, McHanwell S. Core syllabi in anatomy. Teaching Anatomy: A Practical Guide. 2020:443-52.

Patra A, Asghar A, Chaudhary P, Ravi KS. Integration of innovative educational technologies in anatomy teaching: new normal in anatomy education. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2022 Jan;44(1):25-32.

Singh K, Bharatha A, Sa B, Adams OP, Majumder MA. Teaching anatomy using an active and engaging learning strategy. BMC medical education. 2019 Dec;19(1):1-8.

Roxburgh M, Evans DJ. Assessing anatomy education: A perspective from design. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2021 May;14(3):277-86.

Ojukwu CP, Anyanwu EG, Onyebuchi CB, Uchenwoke CI, Okemuo AJ, Okafor CJ, Ikele CN. Anatomy education in physiotherapy training: perceptions of Nigerian-based undergraduate physiotherapy students. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2022 Jan 2;27(1):60-7.

Turhan, B., 2020. Physiotherapy and rehabilitation students’ opinions on anatomy education: a cross-sectional survey study. Physiotherapy Quarterly, 28(2), pp.46-51.

Gangata, H. and Vigurs, K., 2017. An analysis of pedagogical concepts used by anatomy teachers to facilitate the teaching and learning of anatomy to physiotherapy undergraduates. Physiotherapy, 103, pp.e47-e48.

Olivier, B., Ihunwo, A.O., Shead, D. and Roos, R., 2019. Opinions of South African physiotherapists on gross anatomy education for physiotherapy students. South African Journal of Physiotherapy, 75(1), pp.1-10.

Duman, F., 2017. Importance of anatomy education in physical therapy and rehabilitation in Turkey: A qualitative study. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(4), pp.64-71.

Wolf, A., 2019. Exploring Current Topics and Trends in Anatomy Education: A Scoping Review.

Shead, D.A., Roos, R., Olivier, B. and Ihunwo, A.O., 2020. Curricular and pedagogical aspects of gross anatomy education for undergraduate physiotherapy students: a scoping review. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(5), pp.893-951

Rompolski, K., Fojas, C., Taylor, M. and Countess, T., 2022. How Do Physical Therapists Perceive Anatomy Education?. FASEB Journal: Official Publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 36.

Bozer, C. and Kose, K.C., The Opinions of Physiotherapists With And Without Training in Manual Therapy on Undergraduate Anatomy Education: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.