Adoption of Point-of-Care Testing in Emergency and Primary Care Settings in Lahore, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Survey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v6i1.1941Keywords:
point-of-care testing; emergency care; primary care; adoption; governance; interoperability; Lahore.Abstract
Background: Point-of-care testing (POCT) supports rapid clinical decision-making in emergency and primary care, yet adoption of newer biomarker-based tests remains inconsistent and under-described in many low- and middle-income settings (1,12). Objective: To quantify POCT adoption patterns in emergency and primary care units in Lahore, Pakistan, and to assess governance, funding, interoperability, barriers, and predictors of advanced biomarker uptake. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 140 units in Lahore (emergency departments, primary care clinics, urgent care centres) was conducted from January–April 2026 using a structured, pre-piloted questionnaire capturing POCT availability by test type, operational responsibility, governance model, funding mechanism, documentation practices, and perceived barriers. Between-setting comparisons used χ²/Fisher’s exact tests; multivariable logistic regression evaluated predictors of CRP adoption. Results: Adoption of blood glucose, urinalysis, and blood gas testing was 98.6%, 96.4%, and 94.3%, respectively, whereas influenza POCT was 32.9%, CRP 10.7%, and PCT 2.1%. Emergency units had higher blood gas adoption than primary care (97.1% vs 88.5%; p=0.041) and higher influenza POCT use (41.2% vs 23.1%; p=0.049). Only 17.1% reported automatic EHR upload of POCT results, and funding constraints were the most common barrier (46.4%). CRP adoption was associated with primary care setting (aOR 2.21) and permanent funding (aOR 2.74). Conclusion: POCT in Lahore is highly adopted for core tests but limited for advanced biomarkers, with expansion constrained by funding, governance, and interoperability.
Downloads
References
Alrubayyi A, Fahimi R, Hassan M, Madan J, Uthman OA. Current clinical practices and future perspectives for primary healthcare use of point-of-care devices: a scoping review. Int J Clin Pract. 2025;2025(1).
Dewez JE, Nijman RG, Fitchett EJA, Lynch R, de Groot R, van der Flier M, et al. Adoption of C-reactive protein point-of-care tests for the management of acute childhood infections in primary care in the Netherlands and England: a comparative health systems analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1).
Dewez JE, Pembrey L, Nijman R, Torso SD, Grossman Z, Hadjipanayis A, et al. Availability and use of rapid diagnostic tests for the management of acute childhood infections in Europe: a cross-sectional survey of paediatricians. PLoS One. 2022.
Dózsa C, Horváth K, Cserni I, Cseh B. Roadmap for large-scale implementation of point-of-care testing in primary care in Central and Eastern European countries: the Hungarian experience. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022;23.
Elrobaa IH, Khan K, Mohamed E. The role of point-of-care testing to improve acute care and health care services. Cureus. 2024.
Füzéry AK, Kost GJ. Point-of-care testing practices, failure modes, and risk-mitigation strategies in emergency medical services programs in the Canadian province of Alberta. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(11):1352–71.
Goyder C, Tan PS, Verbakel J, Ananthakumar T, Lee JJ, Hayward G, et al. Impact of point-of-care panel tests in ambulatory care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e032132.
Jamshidi N, Waine M, Binet M, Mohan V, Carter DJ, Morgan B. The adoption of point-of-care testing technologies for respiratory tract infections in primary care in Australia: challenges and facilitators. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024.
Jumah MA, Magliah FF, Ageel SA, Almutairi JA, Alsubhi WA, Alamer S, et al. Utilization and benefits of point-of-care testing in primary healthcare. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2025.
Korte BJ, Rompalo A, Manabe YC, Gaydos CA. Overcoming challenges with the adoption of point-of-care testing. Point Care. 2020;19(3):77–83.
Lilly C, Ensom E, Teebagy S, DiMezza D, Dunlap DR, Hafer N, et al. Patient preferences for point-of-care testing. Point Care. 2020.
Lingervelder D, Koffijberg H, Kusters R, Ijzerman MJ. Point-of-care testing in primary care: a systematic review on implementation aspects addressed in test evaluations. Int J Clin Pract. 2019;73(10).
Matthes A, Wolf F, Schmiemann G, Gágyor I, Bleidorn J, Markwart R. Point-of-care laboratory testing in primary care: utilization, limitations and perspectives of general practitioners in Germany. BMC Prim Care. 2023;24(1).
Nichols J. Utilizing point-of-care testing to optimize patient care. EJIFCC. 2021.
Orwig T, Sutaria S, Wang Z, Howard-Wilson S, Dunlap D, Lilly CM, et al. Sampling healthcare professionals’ perspectives on point-of-care technologies from 2019–2021: a survey of benefits, concerns, and development. PLoS One. 2024.
Pandey M, Lyttle M, Cathie K, Munro A, Waterfield T, Roland D, editors. Point-of-care testing in paediatric settings in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional study. Arch Dis Child. 2022.
Pandey M, Lyttle MD, Cathie K, Munro A, Waterfield T, Roland D, et al. Point-of-care testing in paediatric settings in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional study. BMC Emerg Med. 2022;22(1).
Patel KK, Suh-Lailam BB. Implementation of point-of-care testing in a pediatric healthcare setting. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019.
Shephard M, Shephard A, Matthews S, Andrewartha K. The benefits and challenges of point-of-care testing in rural and remote primary care settings in Australia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144(11):1372–80.
Teebagy S, Wang Z, Dunlap DR, Saleeba C, DiMezza D, Crain J, et al. Understanding healthcare professionals’ perspectives on point-of-care testing. Diagnostics. 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Ghulam Mustafa, Sufa Nawaz, Ahmad Zeeshan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Public Licensing Terms
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license:
- You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use.
- Attribution must be given to the original author(s) and source in a manner that is reasonable and does not imply endorsement. If changes were made to the material, this must be indicated.
- No additional restrictions may be applied that conflict with the terms of this license.
For more details, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
