Exploring the Art of Critique: A Narrative Review Approach to Dissecting Health care Literature

Main Article Content

Fazal Rahim
Naseem Farhana
Irfan Ullah
Namra Javed
Shah Faisal
Mamoon Ur Rashid
Muhammad Bilal
Aiman Farooq

Abstract

Background: A research critique or review of an article is the critical analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of a research paper through evidence-based practice, emphasizing the distinction between critique and criticism which helping post graduate students to defended their thesis. The literature review explores the advantages and disadvantages of methodological and statistical balancing in articles.


Objective: This narrative review article aims to dissolve the challenges faced by healthcare professionals while critiquing a quantitative research paper, thesis, or dissertation for the purpose to qualify the defense committee of concerns board of institutions.


Methods: The narrative review article was conducted by a systematic search of electric data bases, primarily Pub Med, Google scholar, and Scopus while referenced through Medley Software. There was no chronological constraint, but the focus was on thorough, current knowledge and foundational works that were well-known and frequently cited in the academic world. Included instructions and textbooks with thorough methods for evaluating quantitative works. Excluded articles with just qualitative critiques and publications written in languages other than English. The main principles for the in-depth analysis were taken from the step-by-step manual that Frances Ryan, Patricia Cronin, and Michael Coughian released in March 2007 and served as the cornerstone for the establishment of an organized method for research critique.


Results: Overall, several review guidelines resulted in the critiquing of writing style, title, abstract, literature review, logical consistency, statement of the phenomenon of interest, theoretical framework, instrumentation, sampling, study design, data collection, data analysis, philosophical underpinning, ethical consideration, discussion, conclusion, and references.


Conclusion: The art of critique offers guidance and tactics about critique in various domains effectively and educates readers on the hints of providing feedback thoughtfully particularly in healthcare profession.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fazal Rahim, Naseem Farhana, Irfan Ullah, Namra Javed, Shah Faisal, Mamoon Ur Rashid, Muhammad Bilal, & Aiman Farooq. (2024). Exploring the Art of Critique: A Narrative Review Approach to Dissecting Health care Literature. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 4(2), 783–789. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.916
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Fazal Rahim, Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Naseem Farhana, Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Irfan Ullah, Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Namra Javed, Peshawar Medical College

MBBS Doctor - Peshawar Medical College

Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Shah Faisal, Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Mamoon Ur Rashid, Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Muhammad Bilal, Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

Aiman Farooq, Peshawar Medical College

MBBS Doctor - Peshawar Medical College

Riphah International University - Islamabad - Prime Foundation Pakistan

References

Coughian M, Cronin P, Ryan F. Step-by-step guide to critiquing research. Part 1: quantitative research. Br J Nurs. 2007;16(12):658-64.

Boswell C, Cannon S. Critique Process. [Place unknown]: [Publisher unknown]; [Year unknown].

Tanner J, Editor S. Reading and critiquing. Nurse Educ. 2003;13(4):162-5.

Vance DE, Talley M, Azuero A, Pearce PF, Christian BJ. Conducting an article critique for a quantitative research study: perspectives for doctoral students and other novice readers. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2013;34(5):67-75.

Stockhausen L, Conrick M. Enhancing learning through technology. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35(2):e1-4. doi:10.5172/conu.14.1.38.

Asc UF, Review A. Article Review & Critique. [Place unknown]: [Publisher unknown]; [Year unknown].

Practice E. EBP: A TEXTBOOK. [Place unknown]: [Publisher unknown]; [Year unknown].

Valente SM. Improving care at the bedside. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(3):288-98.

Meadows KA. So you want to understand the research process? Nurs Stand. 2003;17(42):33-6.

Dale JC. Utilizing research in practice and generating evidence from practice. J Pediatr Health Care. 2005;19(3):183-6. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.02.004.

Hyman R. How to critique a published article. Am Psychol. 2015;70(1):82-5. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.178.

Is W, Article AN, An P, Critique A. Critiquing research articles: What is an article critique? Nurse Educ Today. 2022;102:1-5.

Giuffre M. Critiquing a research article. Nurs Res. 1998;47(2):104-8.

Nursing MH, Fothergill A. A guide to critiquing a research paper on clinical supervision: enhancing skills for practice. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014;21(9):834-40. doi:10.1111/jpm.12161.

Tappen RM. Nursing leadership and management. [Place unknown]: [Publisher unknown]; [Year unknown].

Smith L, Med B, Rmn RGN. Ethical issues in interviewing. Nurse Res. 1992;22(3):98-103.

Most read articles by the same author(s)