Tele-Guided Home Cardiac Rehabilitation After CABG: A Randomized Controlled Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v5i8.1948Keywords:
Cardiac Rehabilitation, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Home-Based Rehabilitation, Functional Capacity, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled TrialAbstract
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is frequently performed for advanced coronary artery disease; however, postoperative recovery is often associated with reduced functional capacity and impaired quality of life. Cardiac rehabilitation programs play an essential role in recovery, yet participation in traditional center-based programs remains limited due to logistical and accessibility barriers. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) program in improving functional capacity, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and quality of life among patients recovering from CABG surgery. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at Arif Memorial Hospital, Lahore, including 26 patients who had undergone CABG surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to either a home-based cardiac rehabilitation group (n = 13) or a control group receiving usual postoperative care (n = 13). The HBCR program consisted of a 12-week structured exercise and education protocol with remote follow-up. Functional capacity was assessed using the six-minute walk test (6MWT), cardiac function was measured through echocardiographic LVEF, and quality of life was evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25. Results: The HBCR group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in functional capacity compared with controls (mean increase 76.4 m vs. 40.8 m; p < 0.001). LVEF increased by 6.3% in the HBCR group compared with 3.2% in the control group (p = 0.001). Quality-of-life scores improved significantly more in the HBCR group (mean increase 24.8 vs. 13.9 points; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Home-based cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved functional capacity, cardiac function, and quality of life in post-CABG patients, supporting its potential role as an accessible alternative to traditional rehabilitation programs.
Downloads
References
Fatema MA, Mujeeb K, Kazi A. Efficacy of home versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation in improving functional capacity and left ventricular ejection fraction in coronary artery bypass graft patients. Int J Public Health Res Dev. 2020;11(5):9312.
Takroni MA, Mohammed TB, Baig ME, Chris S. Home-based versus outpatient-based cardiac rehabilitation post coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020;35(2):120-7.
Avila A, Mediano MFF, Oliveira TMM, Dantas EM, Lazzari JM, Neves VFC, et al. Home-based rehabilitation with telemonitoring guidance for patients with coronary artery disease. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(4):e9943.
Nazir A, Anggraini G. Implementation of home-based cardiac rehabilitation program in patients with coronary artery disease: a literature review. Indones J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;12(2):395.
Uddin J, Virtanen JP, Mäkikallio TH, Isola A, Raitanen J, Korhonen PE, et al. Effect of home-based cardiac rehabilitation in a lower-middle income country. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019;39(6):382-7.
Szylińska A, Łukaszewski M, Imiołek R, Rudzińska A, Kiełbratowska K, Mak M, et al. The efficacy of inpatient versus home-based physiotherapy following coronary artery bypass grafting. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):2572.
Nso N, Mahmoud N, Yolanda M, Kelechi EE, Anthony LN, Solomon OB, et al. Comparative assessment of the long-term efficacy of home-based versus center-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e23485.
Mares M, Sørensen MS, Rasmussen F. Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation programs following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018;16(2):293-310.
Thomas RJ, Beatty AL, Beckie TM, Brewer LC, Brown TM, Forman DE, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2019;140(1):e69-89.
Antoniou V, Davos CH, Kapreli E, Batalik L, Panagiotakos DB, Pepera G. Effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation using wearable sensors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(13):3772.
Ramachandran HJ, Ying J, Wee T, Toh Y, Wu W. Effectiveness of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation as an alternative to phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(14):1518-34.
Schopfer DW, Whooley MA, Allsup K, Pabst M, Shen H, Tarasovsky G, et al. Effects of home-based cardiac rehabilitation on functional status in ischemic heart disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(19):e016456.
Zhong W, Fu C, Xu L, Sun X, Wang S, He C, et al. Effects of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs after percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23(1):312.
Fang J, Huang B, Xu D, Li J, Au WW. Innovative application of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation protocol in patients after coronary intervention. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(4):288-93.
Salzwedel A, Jensen K, Rauch B, Doherty P. Effectiveness of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients treated according to contemporary evidence-based medicine. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(10):1121-32.
Xia T, Fangyang H, Yong P, Baotao H, Xiaobo P, Yong Y, et al. Efficacy of different types of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on coronary heart disease: a network meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(5):2304-12.
Drwal KR, Williams B, Wen-Chih W, Ramzi NEA. Wearable-assisted home rehabilitation: case studies in cardiopulmonary patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2021;41(5):59-65.
McDonagh STJ, Murphy S, Doherty P, et al. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;3:CD007130.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Malia Younas, Hamza Shafee, Atif Khan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Public Licensing Terms
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license:
- You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use.
- Attribution must be given to the original author(s) and source in a manner that is reasonable and does not imply endorsement. If changes were made to the material, this must be indicated.
- No additional restrictions may be applied that conflict with the terms of this license.
For more details, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
