Observational Study on Adherence to modified Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute H3-A6 Guidelines on Blood Sampling Procedures
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The accuracy of clinical laboratory results is paramount for effective patient diagnosis and treatment. However, errors in the pre-analytical phase, particularly during phlebotomy, significantly impact the reliability of laboratory data. With the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines serving as a benchmark for best practices in blood collection, adherence to these standards is crucial for minimizing errors.
Objective: This study aimed to assess compliance with modified CLSI guidelines in phlebotomy procedures within a healthcare setting and identify the most prevalent errors in the pre-analytical phase that could compromise patient safety and the integrity of laboratory results.
Methods: Conducted at the Combined Military Hospital Lahore from January to March 2023, this observational study scrutinized phlebotomy practices across three distinct healthcare settings: emergency department, outpatient department, and clinical wards. A structured checklist, adapted from the European Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) guidelines and aligned with local modifications, was employed to evaluate compliance in 20 specific areas of phlebotomy practice. A total of 285 phlebotomies were observed by specialized staff, with data analyzed using SPSS version 25 to compare error frequencies and compliance rates across different settings and among various healthcare professionals.
Results: The study revealed an overall compliance rate of 88% for identified request forms, 76% for patient identification according to local guidelines, and 66% for proper hand sanitization. However, significant errors were identified in checking for potential complications of venipuncture (34% compliance), with tubes being clearly under or overfilled (46% compliance), and in verifying that patients were prepared for phlebotomy (46% compliance). The error frequency varied across settings, with the highest discrepancies observed in the emergency department. Differences in compliance rates between laboratory staff and nurses were statistically significant in key areas, including patient identification (p<0.001) and tube labeling (p=0.081).
Conclusion: The study highlights a critical need for improving adherence to CLSI guidelines within phlebotomy practices to enhance patient safety and the accuracy of laboratory results. Targeted educational and training interventions are essential for addressing the identified gaps in compliance, particularly in patient identification, sample volume control, and verification of patient preparation for phlebotomy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Makary MA DM. Medical error – the third leading cause of death in the US. Br Med J 2016;353:i2139. Br Med J. 2016;353(i2139).
Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F RF. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2002;48:691-8. Clin Chem. 2002;48:691–8.
Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C GG. Laboratory quality improvement by implementation of phlebotomy guidelines. Med Lab Obs. 2006;38:6–7.
Simundic AM, Cornes M, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M K, S et al. Survey of national guidelines, education and training on phlebotomy in 28 European countries: an original report by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PA). . http://dx. Clin Chem Lab Med [Internet]. 2013;51:1585–93. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2013-%0A0283.
For, ISO 15189:2012. Geneva SI, Organization for Standardization 2012. Medical laboratories – Requirements quality and competence.
Organization. WH, From: A. WHO guidelines on blood drawing.
Simundic AM, Church S, Cornes MP, Grankvist K, Lippi G, Nybo M, et al. Compliance of blood sampling procedures with the CLSI H3-A6 guidelines: An observational study by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) working group for the preanalytical phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;
Guder WG. History of the preanalytical phase: a personal view. Biochem Medica. 2014;
Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Guidi GC. Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing. Clin Lab. 2006;
Simundic AM, Lippi G. Preanalytical phase--a continuous challenge for laboratory professionals. Biochem Medica. 2012;
Grol R, Grol R, Grimshaw JM. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;
Eccles M, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM. Selecting, presenting and delivering clinical guidelines: are there any “magic bullets”? Med J Aust. 2004;
Schünemann HJ, Fretheim A, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Heal Res Policy Syst. 2006;
Lippi G, Blanckaert N, Blanckaert N, Blanckaert N, Bonini P, Bonini P, et al. Causes, consequences, detection, and prevention of identification errors in laboratory diagnostics. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;
Grecu DS, Vlad D, Dumitrascu V. Quality Indicators in the Preanalytical Phase of Testing in a Stat Laboratory. Labmedicine. 2014;
Giménez-Marín A, Giménez-Marín A, Rivas-Ruiz F, del Mar Pérez-Hidalgo M, Molina-Mendoza P, Molina-Mendoza P. Pre-analytical errors management in the clinical laboratory: a five-year study. Biochem Medica. 2014;
Melkie M, Girma A, Girma A, Tsalla T. The practice of venous blood collection among laboratory and non-laboratory professionals working in Ethiopian Government Hospitals: a comparative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;
Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJE, de Veer AJE, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;
Amon E. A Guest Editorial:: Communication Strategies for Reducing Hospital Error and Professional Liability. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;
Thornlow DK, McGuinn K, McGuinn K. A necessary sea change for nurse faculty development: spotlight on quality and safety. J Prof Nurs. 2010;
Lillo RIM, Lillo R, Salinas M, López-Garrigós M, Y NS, Gutiérrez M, et al. Reducing Preanalytical Laboratory Sample Errors Through Educational and Technological Interventions. Clin Lab. 2013;