Correlation and Diagnostic Agreement Between Ultrasonography and MRCP in Evaluating Obstructive Jaundice: A Prospective Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Obstructive jaundice is a clinical condition characterized by the yellow discoloration of the skin, sclera, and mucous membranes due to elevated bilirubin levels caused by bile flow obstruction. Accurate diagnosis of the obstruction's cause and site is essential for effective management. Ultrasonography (USG) is commonly used for initial screening, but it has limitations, especially in visualizing the distal common bile duct (CBD). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has emerged as a superior, non-invasive imaging modality with higher accuracy in evaluating biliary obstructions.
Objective: To evaluate the correlation and agreement between USG and MRCP findings in patients with obstructive jaundice and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of each modality in detecting the level and cause of biliary obstruction.
Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted over six months at a tertiary care hospital in Rawalpindi. A total of 32 patients with clinical suspicion of obstructive jaundice were included. Each patient underwent both USG and MRCP. USG was performed using a GE Logiq-e machine, followed by MRCP on a Philips Achieva 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Pearson's correlation coefficient and kappa statistics were used to assess the correlation and agreement between the two modalities. The diagnostic accuracy of USG and MRCP was compared based on the detection of the level of obstruction and the identification of benign and malignant etiologies.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.53 ± 13.41 years, with 65.6% being male. MRCP showed a diagnostic accuracy of 97.2% compared to 78.1% for USG. MRCP detected distal CBD calculi with 100% accuracy, while USG missed these in 11 cases. A positive correlation was found between USG and MRCP in detecting the site of obstruction (r = 0.48, p = 0.005), the porta hepatis as the site of obstruction (r = 0.47, p = 0.006), and the ampulla as the site of obstruction (r = 0.47, p = 0.006). However, the correlation for benign etiologies was weak (r = 0.094, p = 0.607), and for malignant etiologies, it was moderate (r = 0.31, p = 0.08).
Conclusion: MRCP demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared to USG in evaluating patients with obstructive jaundice, particularly in detecting distal CBD calculi and malignant lesions. While USG remains useful as an initial screening tool, MRCP should be considered the preferred imaging modality when detailed evaluation is required.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Leung TS, Outlaw F, MacDonald LW, Meek JJ. Jaundice Eye Color Index (JECI): Quantifying the Yellowness of the Sclera in Jaundiced Neonates With Digital Photography. J Perinat Med. 2019;10(3):1250-6.
Nadkarni K, Jahagirdar R, Kagzi R, Pinto A, Bhalerao R. Surgical Obstructive Jaundice. J Postgrad Med. 1981;27(1):33.
Alsaigh S, Aldhubayb MA, Alobaid AS. Diagnostic Reliability of Ultrasound Compared to Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in the Detection of Obstructive Jaundice: A Retrospective Medical Records Review. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020;12(10).
Singh A, Mann HS, Thukral CL, Singh NR. Diagnostic Accuracy of MRCP as Compared to Ultrasound/CT in Patients With Obstructive Jaundice. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(3):103.
Swaraj S, Mohapatra M, Sathpathy G, Yalamanchi R, Sen K, Menon SM, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography Versus Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Biliary Obstruction. Cureus. 2023;15(1).
Irom P, Shetty P, Aggarwal A. Diagnostic Utility of MRCP in Obstructive Jaundice and Comparison With CT & Ultrasonography. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;2(3).
Khan R, Hussain Z, Bari V, Fiaz AB. Safety of Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Stenting in Patients With Obstructive Jaundice. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29(1):24.
Kushwah APS, Jain S, Agarwal R, Tomar SP. Biliary Tract Obstructive Diseases: A Comparative Evaluation by Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography. Int J Surg Sci. 2015;3(4):149-53.
Al-Obaidi S, Al-Hilli M, Fadhel AA. The Role of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Obstructive Jaundice. Pak J Med Sci. 2007;6(1):7-17.
Kaur A, Malaviya A, Deepika K, Kaur D. Comprehensive Evaluation of MRCP Versus Ultrasonography in Biliary Obstruction. Int J Med Res Rev. 2018;6(2):143-52.
Kumar M, Prashad R, Kumar A, Sharma R, Acharya S, Chattopadhyay T. Relative Merits of Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography, and Cholangiography in Patients of Surgical Obstructive Jaundice. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45(24):2027-32.
Honickman SP, Mueller PR, Wittenberg J, et al. Ultrasound in Obstructive Jaundice: Prospective Evaluation of Site and Cause. Radiology. 1983;147(2):511-5.
Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography: A Meta-Analysis of Test Performance in Suspected Biliary Disease. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(7):547-57.
Guibaud L, Bret P, Reinhold C, Atri M, Barkun AN. Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Value of MR Cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(4):847-50.
Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR Cholangiopancreatography After Unsuccessful or Incomplete ERCP. Radiology. 1996;199(1):91-8.
Anderson SW, Lucey BC, Varghese JC, Soto JA. Accuracy of MDCT in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(1):174-80.
Bhatt C, Shah P, Prajapati H, Modi J. Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy Between USG and MRCP in Biliary and Pancreatic Pathology. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2005;15(2):177-81.
Scharschmidt BF, Goldberg HI, Schmid R. Approach to the Patient With Cholestatic Jaundice. N Engl J Med. 1983;308(25):1515-9.