Comparative Effect of Cylindrical Lenses Versus Spherical Equivalent on Contrast Sensitivity Cylindrical Lenses vs. Spherical Equivalent on Contrast Sensitivity
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Astigmatism is a common refractive error that affects visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Cylindrical lenses and spherical equivalents are commonly prescribed to correct these errors, but their comparative effects on contrast sensitivity are not well-documented.
Objective: To compare the effects of cylindrical lenses versus spherical equivalents on contrast sensitivity in individuals with astigmatism.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 68 participants with astigmatism, aged 15 to 30 years. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either cylindrical lens correction or spherical equivalent correction. Contrast sensitivity was measured using the Pelli-Robson chart at baseline and during two follow-ups over three months. Data were analyzed using Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance and the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: The mean contrast sensitivity decreased from 1.95 ± 0.07 to 1.93 ± 0.09 over three months. Cylindrical lenses resulted in higher contrast sensitivity scores (2.00 in 67.6% of cases at final visit) compared to spherical equivalents (44.1%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Cylindrical lenses significantly improve contrast sensitivity compared to spherical equivalents, particularly in moderate to high astigmatism.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Icoz M, Yildirim B, Gurturk Icoz SG. Comparison Of Different Methods Of Correcting Astigmatism In Cataract Surgery. Clin Exp Optom. 2023;106(8):1-6.
Bu S, Jiang Y, Gao Y, Bai X, Chen X, Zhang H, et al. The Impact Of Posterior Corneal Astigmatism On The Surgical Planning Of Toric Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation. Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2023;3(1):39-46.
Hassan S, Nabi S, Zahoor N, Khan S, Makayee AA, Wahab A. Prevalence And Pattern Of Refractive Errors Among School-Going Children In District Baramulla, Kashmir: A Cross Sectional Study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71(12):3642-3645.
Rahimi-Nasrabadi H, Moore-Stoll V, Tan J, Dellostritto S, Jin J, Dul MW, et al. Luminance Contrast Shifts Dominance Balance Between On And Off Pathways In Human Vision. J Neurosci. 2023;43(6):993-1007.
Abdolalizadeh P, Mehrdad R, Saberzadeh-Ardestani B, Pouragha H, Alipour F, Esmaili M. Prevalence Of Uncorrected Distance Refractive Errors And Associated Risk Factors In Employees Of An Academic Centre. Clin Exp Optom. 2023;106(8):869-875.
Molina R, Redondo B, Ortiz C, Vera J, Diaz JA, Jimenez R. Higher Order Aberrations According To Spherical And Astigmatic Refractive Errors In Children. Clin Exp Optom. 2024;107(1):1-12.
Barreto J, Barboni MT, Feitosa-Santana C, Sato JR, Bechara SJ, Ventura DF, et al. Intraocular Straylight And Contrast Sensitivity After Contralateral Wavefront-Guided LASIK And Wavefront-Guided PRK For Myopia. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(8):588-593.
Behboudi H, Rajavi Z, Sabbaghi H, Katibeh M, Kheiri B, Yaseri M, et al. Prevalence Of Refractive Errors In Population Aged 50 Years And Over: The Gilan Eye Study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2024;34(2):449-460.
Okenwa-Vincent EE, Naidoo J, Clarke-Farr PC. Utility For Uncorrected Refractive Errors In Adolescent Schoolchildren In Kakamega County, Kenya. Optom Vis Sci. 2023;100(9):631-637.
Bian L, Ma B, Sun Z, Li W, Liu Y, Qin R, et al. Prevalence Data For Total Corneal Astigmatism In Cataract Patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024;262(4):1-10.
Chen S, Liu X, Sha X, Yang X, Yu X. Relationship Between Axial Length And Spherical Equivalent Refraction In Chinese Children. Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2021;1(2):100010.
Chen HC, Lin JY, Chiu HY. Rectangular Illumination Using A Secondary Optics With Cylindrical Lens For LED Street Light. Opt Express. 2013;21(3):3201-3212.
Chen PJ, Lee YK, Lai CC. Significant Changes Of Corneal Astigmatism After Levator Muscle Surgery For Acquired Blepharoptosis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;38(1):1-5.
Perez-Sanz L, Vega F, Azor-Moron JA, Cuellar F, Millan MS, Garzon N. Tolerance To Residual Astigmatism Of An Isofocal Intraocular Lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024;262(4):1169-1180.
Chen X, Zhang J. Lens Design For Parallel Cylindrical Anamorphic Attachments With Finite Object Distance. Appl Opt. 2022;61(15):4610-4619.
Dayi O, Bulut E, Karadag M, Bulut H. Ocular Biometry Characteristics And Its Relationship With Age, Gender, Spherical Equivalent In Turkish Children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25(5):569-575.
Ye Y, Aruma A, Zhao W, Lu ZL, Zhou X, Zhao J. A Novel Quick Contrast Sensitivity Function Test In Chinese Adults With Myopia And Its Related Parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;261(7):2071-2080.
Atchison DA, Cooke DL. Refractive Errors Occurring With Tilt Of Intraocular Lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024;44(1):177-181.
Poudel S, Jin J, Rahimi-Nasrabadi H, Dellostritto S, Dul MW, Viswanathan S, et al. Contrast Sensitivity Of On And Off Human Retinal Pathways In Myopia. J Neurosci. 2024;44(3):1-9.
Rahimi-Nasrabadi H, Jin J, Mazade R, Pons C, Najafian S, Alonso JM. Image Luminance Changes Contrast Sensitivity In Visual Cortex. Cell Rep. 2021;34(5):108692.
Wang J, Liu X, Huang J, Deng R, Zhao S, Chen Y, et al. Reduced Contrast Sensitivity Function Is Correlated With Changes To Cone Photoreceptors In Simple High Myopia. Front Neurosci. 2024;18:1274651.
Wei L, Meng J, Cheng K, He W, Qi J, Lu ZL, et al. Contrast Sensitivity Function: A More Sensitive Index For Assessing Protective Effects Of The Cilioretinal Artery On Macular Function In High Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63(13):25.