Age-Related Effects of Donor on Corneal Transplantation and Clinical Study of Causal Allograft Rejection in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v5i2.1748Keywords:
Corneal transplantation, Donor age, Allograft rejection, Clinical outcomesAbstract
Background: Corneal transplantation is a widely performed surgical procedure for treating corneal blindness. Donor-related factors, particularly age, are known to influence graft survival and rejection rates. While younger donor corneas exhibit higher endothelial cell density, their potential for increased immunogenicity remains a concern. This study evaluates the impact of donor age on corneal transplantation outcomes in Pakistan. Objective: To assess the influence of donor age on graft clarity, visual acuity, and allograft rejection rates following corneal transplantation. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted from February 2013 to June 2016 in collaboration with the Rawalpindi Eye Donor Organization, The Shifa Eye Trust, and Saba Deseret Eye Hospital. A total of 300 patients underwent corneal transplantation, categorized by donor age: <40 years (n=105), 40–60 years (n=120), and >60 years (n=75). Surgical techniques included Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) (70%), Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) (20%), and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) (10%). Postoperative outcomes were assessed at 12 months. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25, with chi-square tests for categorical variables and logistic regression for predictors of rejection. Results: At 12 months, 80% (n=240) of grafts remained clear, while 20% (n=60) developed opacity. Visual acuity improved to 20/40 or better in 85% (n=255) of patients. The overall rejection rate was 15% (n=45), highest in young donor grafts (21%), followed by middle-aged (13%) and older donor grafts (8%) (p=0.046). Patients undergoing DSEK and DMEK had significantly lower rejection rates than PK (p<0.01). Conclusion: Donor age did not significantly affect graft clarity or visual acuity but influenced rejection rates, with younger donor grafts exhibiting a higher risk. Advanced surgical techniques and postoperative steroid management improved outcomes. Future research should focus on optimizing donor selection criteria and long-term graft survival strategies.
Downloads
References
Armitage WJ, Goodchild C, Griffin MD. Factors influencing the suitability of organ-cultured corneas for transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(1):2892-2900.
Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, et al. A global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(2):167-173.
Hassan SS, Akhtar N, Mehmood K. Challenges in the establishment of an eye bank in Pakistan: An overview of the first year of operation of the Pakistan Eye Bank Society International. Exp Clin Transplant. 2015;13(Suppl 1):41-45.
Lass JH, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Ayala AR, et al. Corneal endothelial cell loss 3 years after successful Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in the Cornea Preservation Time Study: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(12):1423-1429.
Sugar A, Montoya M. Effect of donor age on outcome of corneal transplantation. Cornea. 2014;33(11):1149-1153.
Joyce NC. Age-related changes in the corneal endothelium and stroma as seen with specular microscopy. Cornea. 2012;31(1):1007-1015.
Price MO, Calhoun P, Kollman C, Price FW, Lass JH. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: Ten-year endothelial cell loss compared with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2016;125(4):555-562.
Anshu A, Price MO, Tan DT, Price FW. Endothelial keratoplasty: A revolution in evolution. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57(3):236-252.
Baratz KH, Nau CB, Winter EJ, et al. Effects of donor age on corneal endothelium determined by specular microscopy. Cornea. 1997;16(6):634-638.
Boisjoly HM, Tourigny R, Bazin R, Laughrea PA, Bazin J, Langlois M. Risk factors of corneal graft failure. Ophthalmology. 1993;100(11):1728-1735.
Bourne WM. Cellular changes in transplanted human corneas. Cornea. 2001;20(6):560-569.
Coster DJ, Williams KA. The impact of corneal allograft rejection on the long-term outcome of corneal transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(6):1112-1122.
Dana MR, Qian Y, Hamrah P. Twenty-five-year panorama of corneal immunology: Emerging concepts in the immunopathogenesis of microbial keratitis, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, and corneal transplant rejection. Cornea. 2000;19(5):625-643.
Edge AS, Fuchs E. Accumulation of an extra-basement membrane component in eyes with granular corneal dystrophy. Nature. 1982;299(5882):643-645.
Fuest M, Ang M, Htoon HM, Tan D. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;12:261-266.
Gipson IK. Age-related changes and diseases of the ocular surface and cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(14):ORSF48-53.
Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, Pande MV. Biometry of the cornea and anterior chamber after hyperopic and myopic LASIK, photorefractive keratectomy, and radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 1999;15(4):406-414.
Price MO, Price FW. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(5):857-865.
Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Safety and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(1):29-39.
Smith JA, Alper SJ, Azar DT, et al. Effect of topical corticosteroids on corneal transplant survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;205:15-24.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Junaid, Azmat Kamran, Suriyakala Perumal, Irfan Ali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Public Licensing Terms
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license:
- You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use.
- Attribution must be given to the original author(s) and source in a manner that is reasonable and does not imply endorsement.
- No additional restrictions may be applied that conflict with the terms of this license.
For more details, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.