Cyber-Bullying at Workplace and its Mental Health Outcomes: A Linguistic Analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Cyberbullying is a growing concern in educational settings, but recent evidence indicates that it has become prevalent in professional environments as well. With the advent of digital communication, employees have become vulnerable to cyberbullying not only during work hours but also in their personal time. This study focuses on understanding the psychological impacts of cyberbullying in the workplace.
Objective: The primary aim of this research was to investigate the lived experiences of cyberbullying victims in the workplace, to comprehend the depth of its psychological implications, and to identify coping mechanisms employed by victims. The study also aimed to examine the patterns of cyberbullying across different hierarchical levels within an organization.
Methods: A qualitative, phenomenological approach was adopted, involving semi-structured interviews with eight employees from a public-sector university in Lahore, Pakistan. Participants were selected through purposive and snowball sampling techniques, and thematic analysis was utilized to interpret the data.
Results: Participants reported experiencing stress, embarrassment, and anger due to cyberbullying, with these emotions stemming from a sense of vulnerability and public exposure. Cyberbullying incidents occurred through emails, social media, and text messages, often leading to a need for self-preservation and coping strategies. The study found that aggressors included not just superiors but also peers and subordinates.
Conclusion: The study concluded that workplace cyberbullying is a multifaceted issue that affects individuals across different levels of employment. It causes significant psychological distress, necessitating effective strategies for prevention and intervention. Future research should explore the role of organizational leadership in addressing workplace cyberbullying and aim for more generalizable findings through quantitative research.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bauman S. Types of cyberbullying. Cyberbullying: What counselors need to know. 2015:53-8.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006;3(2):77-101.
Brown A, Danaher PA. CHE principles: Facilitating authentic and dialogical semi-structured interviews in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2019;42(1):76-90.
Compton WM, Han B, Hughes A, Jones CM, Blanco C. Use of marijuana for medical purposes among adults in the United States. Jama. 2017;317(2):209-11.
Ashiq S, Majeed S, Malik F. Psychological predictors of cyber bullying in early adulthood. Health Science Journal. 2016;10(3):1.
Baloch H. Internet Rights and Legislation in Pakistan: A Critique on Cyber Crime Bill, 2016. Accessed on 23rd June. 2016.
Vranjes I, Baillien E, Vandebosch H, Erreygers S, De Witte H. The dark side of working online: Towards a definition and an Emotion Reaction model of workplace cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;69:324-34.
Willard NE. Cyberbullying and cyberthreats: Responding to the challenge of online social aggression, threats, and distress: Research press; 2007.
Coyne I, Farley S, Axtell C, Sprigg C, Best L, Kwok O. Understanding the relationship between experiencing workplace cyberbullying, employee mental strain and job satisfaction: A dysempowerment approach. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2017;28(7):945-72.
Howard AG, Attard SM, Herring AH, Wang H, Du S, Gordon-Larsen P. Socioeconomic gradients in the Westernization of diet in China over 20 years. SSM-Population health. 2021;16:100943.
Forssell R. Exploring cyberbullying and face-to-face bullying in working life–Prevalence, targets and expressions. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;58:454-60.
Barlett CP, Gentile DA, Chew C. Predicting cyberbullying from anonymity. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 2016;5(2):171.
Musharraf S, Lewis C. Cyberbullying—Bullying in the virtual world: A cautionary note for medical educators. J Pak Psych Soc. 2016;13:35-6.
Salazar LR. Workplace bullying in digital environments: Antecedents, consequences, prevention, and future directions. Handbook of research on organizational culture and diversity in the modern workforce: IGI Global; 2017. p. 132-54.
Marshall B, Cardon P, Poddar A, Fontenot R. Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. Journal of computer information systems. 2013;54(1):11-22.
Willig C, Rogers WS. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology: Sage; 2017.
Zych I, Ortega-Ruiz R, Del Rey R. Scientific research on bullying and cyberbullying: Where have we been and where are we going. Aggression and violent behavior. 2015;24:188-98.
Shaikh MA, Kayani A, Shaikh IA. Bullying and injury profile of female intermediate and bachelor programme students--perspective from Islamabad. JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2013;63(3):411-2.
Walker W. Ethical considerations in phenomenological research. Nurse researcher. 2007;14(3).
Ford DP. Virtual harassment: media characteristics' role in psychological health. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2013;28(4):408-28.
Crothers LM, Lipinski J, Steeves T, Drischler B, Schmitt AJ, Hughes TL, et al. Bullying at Work and Its Impact on Job Satisfaction: An Exploration of School Psychologists. Journal of Organizational Psychology. 2022;22(1).
D'cruz P, Noronha E. Navigating the extended reach: Target experiences of cyberbullying at work. Information and organization. 2013;23(4):324-43.