Use and Outcomes of Amplatz Renal Dilator for Treatment of Urethral Strictures
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Urethral strictures pose a significant challenge in urological practice, with traditional treatments often associated with considerable morbidity. The quest for less invasive yet effective interventions has led to innovative approaches, among which the Amplatz Renal Dilator has emerged as a promising tool.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Amplatz Renal Dilator in the treatment of urethral strictures, focusing on urinary flow rates, stricture severity, patient symptom relief, and the incidence of complications.
Methods: A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted at multiple centers including Gajju Khan Medical College Swabi Naseer Teaching Hospital Peshawar in the duration from January, 2023 to June, 2023. Total Thirty-five participants diagnosed with urethral strictures were enrolled and treated with the Amplatz Renal Dilator. The study spanned two years, with an initial six-month recruitment phase followed by an eighteen-month follow-up. Efficacy was assessed through improvements in urinary flow rates and stricture severity, while safety was evaluated by monitoring procedural complications and recurrences. Quality of life and patient satisfaction were also measured using validated questionnaires.
Results: Post-treatment, urinary flow rates significantly improved from a mean of 10 mL/s (SD ± 2) to 15 mL/s (SD ± 3) (p<0.001). Stricture severity decreased from Grade 3 (SD ± 1) to Grade 1 (SD ± 1) (p<0.001). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) from 22 (SD ± 4) to 10 (SD ± 3) (p<0.001). The incidence of immediate complications was 5%, with no significant long-term complications reported. The recurrence rate of strictures was observed at 10%.
Conclusion: The Amplatz Renal Dilator demonstrates significant efficacy in improving urinary flow rates and reducing stricture severity, with minimal complications and a low recurrence rate. These findings suggest that the Amplatz Renal Dilator is a safe and effective option for the treatment of urethral strictures, warranting further investigation in larger, randomized controlled trials.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Lazzeri M, Sansalone S, Guazzoni G, Barbagli G. Incidence, causes, and complications of urethral stricture disease. European Urology Supplements. 2016;15(1):2-6.
Tritschler S, Roosen A, Füllhase C, Stief CG, Rübben H. Urethral stricture: etiology, investigation and treatments. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2013;110(13):220.
Ekeke O, Amusan O. Clinical presentation and treatment of urethral stricture: Experience from a tertiary hospital in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. African Journal of Urology. 2017;23(1):72-7.
Raykar RR, Jadhav RR. A clinical study of evaluation of different modalities of treatment and etiologies of stricture urethra. International Surgery Journal. 2019;6(4):1148-52.
Lumen N, Campos-Juanatey F, Greenwell T, Martins FE, Osman NI, Riechardt S, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on urethral stricture disease (part 1): management of male urethral stricture disease. European Urology. 2021;80(2):190-200.
Rourke K. The epidemiology, clinical presentation, and economic burden of urethral stricture. Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery: Springer; 2013. p. 83-93.
King C, Rourke KF. Urethral stricture is frequently a morbid condition: Incidence and factors associated with complications related to urethral stricture. Urology. 2019;132:189-94.
Shah O, Marien T. Ureteral and ureteroenteric strictures. Ureteroscopy: Indications, Instrumentation & Technique: Springer; 2012. p. 55-72.
Yooni AY, Rozanski AT, Shakir NA, Viers BR, Ward EE, Bergeson RL, et al. Balloon dilation performs poorly as a salvage management strategy for recurrent bulbar urethral strictures following failed urethroplasty. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2020;9(1):3.
Peng P-x, Lai S-c, Seery S, He Y-h, Zhao H, Wang X-m, et al. Balloon versus Amplatz for tract dilation in fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2020;10(7).
Marberger M, editor Urological Association of Asia (UAA) Lecture-The Management of Renal Tumors is Changing. International Journal of Urology; 2012: WILEY-BLACKWELL 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA.
Sivaraj M. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy-A Prospective Clinical study: Stanley Medical College, Chennai; 2014.
Geavlete PA, Georgescu D, Mulţescu R, Alexandrescu E, Drăguţescu M, Stănescu F, et al. Percutaneous Approach in Renal Lithiasis. Percutaneous Surgery of the Upper Urinary Tract: Elsevier; 2016. p. 25-103.
Shi Y, Liang H-g, Yang X, Hai B, Wang L, Xing Y-f, et al. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy with Chinese one-shot tract dilation technique based on stimulated diuresis: A report of 67 cases. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences]. 2016;36:881-6.
Hoe J. Percutaneous Interventional Procedures in the Kidney. AArao. 1995:144.
El-Hefnawy AS, Elsaadany MM, Soliman SA, Osman Y, Shoma AM, Shokeir AA. Endourological Management of Urological Complications Following Renal Transplantation. Difficult Cases in Endourology. 2013:169-84.
Azab SS. Comparative study between Amplatz renal dilator vs visual internal urethrotomy (cold knife) for the treatment of male urethral stricture. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 2020;54(5):431-7.
Mahmood SN, Ahmed CJ, Tawfeeq H, Bapir R, Fakhralddin SS, Abdulla BA, et al. Evaluation of mini-PCNL and RIRS for renal stones 1–2 cm in an economically challenged setting: A prospective cohort study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2022;81:104235.
Akkoc A, Aydin C, Kartalmis M, Topaktas R, Altin S, Yilmaz Y. Use and outcomes of amplatz renal dilator for treatment of urethral strictures. International braz j urol. 2016;42:356-64.
Alishah S, Khayyamfar F, Foroutan SK. Antegrade Urethral Approach for Urethral Stricture in Patients with Previous Failed Retrograde Intervention. Translational Research in Urology. 2020;2(2):37-44.
Caamina L, Pietropaolo A, Prudhomme T, Bañuelos B, Boissier R, Pecoraro A, et al. Endourological Management of Ureteral Stricture in Patients with Renal Transplant–A Systematic Review of Literature. Journal of Endourology. 2024(ja).
Karsli O, Ustuner M, Memik O, Ulukaradag E. Comparison of urethral dilation with Amplatz Dilators and internal urethrotomy techniques for the treatment of urethral strictures. Urology Journal. 2020;17(1):68.
Nomikos M, Papanikolaou S, Athanasopoulos G, Papatsoris A. The use of Amplatz renal dilators in the minimally invasive management of complex urethral strictures. Central European Journal of Urology. 2017;70(3):301.
Minni A, Dragonetti A, Sciuto A, Cavaliere C, Rosati D, Azimonti D, et al. Use of balloon catheter dilation vs. traditional endoscopic sinus surgery in management of light and severe chronic rhinosinusitis of the frontal sinus: a multicenter prospective randomized study. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences. 2018;22(2).
Meeks JJ, Erickson BA, Granieri MA, Gonzalez CM. Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review. The Journal of urology. 2009;182(4):1266-70.
Pang KH, Chapple CR, Chatters R, Downey AP, Harding CK, Hind D, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuncts to minimally invasive treatment of urethral stricture in men. European Urology. 2021;80(4):467-79.
Zaid UB, Lavien G, Peterson AC. Management of the recurrent male urethral stricture. Current urology reports. 2016;17:1-8.