Frequency of Readmission Among American Society of Anesthesia Classification after Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty

Authors

  • Hafeez ur Rehman Zahoor Liaquat National Hospital Karachi Pakistan.
  • Saad Iqbal Patel Hospital Karachi Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Abdullah Sharif Beaumont Hospital
  • Muhammad Hunain Shaheed Muhtarma Benazir Bhutto Institute of Trauma Karachi Pakistan.
  • Muhammad Anwar Liaquat National Hospital Karachi Pakistan.
  • Hammar Shahid The Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.726

Keywords:

ASA Classification, Joint Arthroplasty, Postoperative Complications, Readmission, Total Hip Arthroplasty, Total Knee Arthroplasty, Preoperative Assessment, Surgical Outcomes, Patient Care

Abstract

Background: With the aging population and the increasing prevalence of degenerative joint diseases, the need for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has surged. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System plays a pivotal role in preoperative evaluation, predicting the risk of postoperative complications and mortality. Understanding the impact of ASA classification on surgical outcomes can guide improvements in patient care and surgical planning.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ASA classification and the risk of postoperative readmission in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty.

Methods: Conducted at a single urban medical center, this descriptive, non-randomized study involved 352 patients who underwent primary TJA due to osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, or avascular necrosis. Participants were assigned an ASA classification preoperatively. The primary outcome measured was readmission within three months post-surgery, with secondary outcomes including the incidence of complications such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, and surgical site infections. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21, with significance set at p<0.05.

Results: Of the 352 participants, 165 (46.9%) were from rural areas, and 187 (53.1%) were from urban locations. The readmission rate was 6.8%, with ASA III and IV classifications showing significantly higher readmission rates (9.7% and 28.6%, respectively) compared to ASA I and II (1.8% and 4.4%). The most common reasons for readmission were chest infections (37.5%), followed by cardiac complications, pulmonary embolism, and neurological complications (20.8% each). The study found a significant correlation between higher ASA classification and increased readmission risk (p=0.021).

Conclusion: Higher ASA classifications are associated with a greater risk of postoperative readmission in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive preoperative assessments and tailored postoperative care strategies to mitigate the risk of readmission, particularly in patients with higher ASA scores.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Hafeez ur Rehman Zahoor, Liaquat National Hospital Karachi Pakistan.

Registrar, Orthopaedics Department, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Saad Iqbal, Patel Hospital Karachi Pakistan.

Registrar, Orthopaedic Department, Patel Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Muhammad Abdullah Sharif, Beaumont Hospital

Registrar, Orthopaedic Department, Beaumont Hospital Ireland.

Muhammad Hunain, Shaheed Muhtarma Benazir Bhutto Institute of Trauma Karachi Pakistan.

Resident Medical Officer, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Shaheed Muhtarma Benazir Bhutto Institute of Trauma, Karachi, Pakistan.

Muhammad Anwar, Liaquat National Hospital Karachi Pakistan.

Resident, Orthopaedics Surgery Department, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Hammar Shahid, The Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi Pakistan.

Resident, Department of Surgery, Section of Orthopedics, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

References

Lee Y-H, Ko P-Y, Kao S-L, Lin M-C, Wei JC-CJTJoA. Risk of total knee and hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-year retrospective cohort study of 65,898 patients. 2020;35(12):3517-23.

Taylor-Williams O, Nossent J, Inderjeeth CAJR, therapy. Incidence and complication rates for total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis across four decades. 2020;7:685-702.

Cordtz R, Odgaard A, Kristensen LE, Overgaard S, Dreyer L, editors. Risk of medical complications following total hip or knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a register-based cohort study from Denmark. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism; 2020: Elsevier.

Tung K-K, Lee Y-H, Lin C-C, Lee C-H, Lin M-C, Wei JC-CJFiM. Opposing Trends in Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasties for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis vs. the General Population—A 14-Year Retrospective Study in Taiwan. 2021;8:640275.

Nishitani K, Ito H, Murata K, Kuriyama S, Nakamura S, Matsuda SJTK. Postoperative function of patients with rheumatoid arthritis after total knee arthroplasty in the last decade was comparable in the unadjusted cohort but inferior in the propensity score matched cohort with that of patients with osteoarthritis. 2024;47:228-38.

Iordache SA, Şerban B, Popa MIG, Cursaru AJRJoOS, Traumatology. Current review of surgical management options for total knee arthroplasty in the rheumatoid knee.4(1):38-45.

Bernal-Fortich LD, Aguilar CA, Rivera-Villa AH, Galindo-Avalos J, Aguilera-Martínez P, Torres-González R, et al. A prospective randomized trial of total synovectomy versus limited synovectomy in primary total knee arthroplasty: evaluation of bleeding, postoperative pain, and quality of life with SF-12 v2. 2018;28:701-6.

Galea VP, Rojanasopondist P, Connelly JW, Bragdon CR, Huddleston III JI, Ingelsrud LH, et al. Changes in patient satisfaction following total joint arthroplasty. 2020;35(1):32-8.

Hofstede SN, Gademan MG, Stijnen T, Nelissen RG, Marang-Van De Mheen PJ, Verdegaal A-OsgSB-ZMvDSKPvKPNRPYPMRMSBTS. The influence of preoperative determinants on quality of life, functioning and pain after total knee and hip replacement: a pooled analysis of Dutch cohorts. 2018;19:1-11.

Felix J, Becker C, Vogl M, Buschner P, Plötz W, Leidl RJH, et al. Patient characteristics and valuation changes impact quality of life and satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty–results from a German prospective cohort study. 2019;17:1-10.

Mudumbai SC, Pershing S, Bowe T, Kamal RN, Sears ED, Finlay AK, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status. 2019;19:1-11.

Markovic D, Jevtovic-Stoimenov T, Stojanovic M, Vukovic A, Dinic V, Markovic-Zivkovic B, et al. Addition of clinical risk scores improves prediction performance of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification for postoperative mortality in older patients: a pilot study. 2018;9:51-9.

Seicean A, Seicean S, Neuhauser D, Fyda J, Mehta A, Weil RJJIN. Outcomes after neurosurgical operations in American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) class 5 patients. 2020;20:100692.

Pflüger MJ, Frömel DE, Meurer AJTJoA. Total hip arthroplasty revision surgery: Impact of morbidity on perioperative outcomes. 2021;36(2):676-81.

Sinclair ST, Emara AK, Orr MN, McConaghy KM, Klika AK, Piuzzi NSJEOR. Comorbidity indices in orthopaedic surgery: a narrative review focused on hip and knee arthroplasty. 2021;6(8):629-40.

George J, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Klika AK, Barsoum WK, Higuera CA, et al. Readmission, reoperation, and complications: total hip vs total knee arthroplasty. 2018;33(3):655-60.

Tokgöz E. Complications of total hip arthroplasty. Total hip arthroplasty: Medical and biomedical engineering and science concepts: Springer; 2022. p. 97-138.

Niemeläinen M. Outcome of Contemporary Knee Arthroplasty: In terms of survivorship and patient reported outcome measures with special reference to patients less than 65 years of age. 2020.

Warren JA, Sundaram K, Anis HK, Kamath AF, Higuera CA, Piuzzi NSJTJoa. Have venous thromboembolism rates decreased in total hip and knee arthroplasty? 2020;35(1):259-64.

de Araújo Loures E, Rocha GM, Loures DN, Leite ICG, Loures CNJOJoO. Multimodal Stratified Approach for Prevention of Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. 2018;8(12):429-42.

Warren JA, Sundaram K, Kamath AF, Molloy RM, Krebs VE, Mont MA, et al. Venous thromboembolism rates did not decrease in lower extremity revision total joint arthroplasty from 2008 to 2016. 2019;34(11):2774-9.

Ondeck NT, Bohl DD, Bovonratwet P, Anandasivam NS, Cui JJ, McLynn RP, et al. Predicting adverse outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of demographics, the American Society of Anesthesiologists class, the modified Charlson comorbidity index, and the modified frailty index. 2018;26(20):735-43.

Rodríguez CG, Murgas MAA, Uribe AC, Diaz VB, León GB, Volpe ALJJoCO, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality in total joint arthroplasty: Exploring the limits of early discharge. 2021;14:1-7.

Slullitel PA, Estefan M, Ramírez-Serrudo WM, Comba FM, Zanotti G, Piccaluga F, et al. Re-admissions treble the risk of late mortality after primary total hip arthroplasty. 2018;42:2015-23.

Cochrane NH, Belay ES, Kim B, Wu M, O'Donnell J, Ryan S, et al. Risk Factors for Early Readmission and Reoperation After Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty. 2024;47(1):e38-e44.

Malik AT, Quatman CE, Phieffer LS, Jain N, Khan SN, Ly TVJJoCO, et al. 30-day adverse events, length of stay and re-admissions following surgical management of pelvic/acetabular fractures. 2019;10(5):890-5.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-21

How to Cite

Zahoor, H. ur R., Iqbal, S., Sharif, M. A., Hunain, M., Anwar, M., & Shahid, H. (2024). Frequency of Readmission Among American Society of Anesthesia Classification after Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 4(2), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.726

Most read articles by the same author(s)