Assessing the Efficacy of Pressure Algometry in Lower Back Pain: A Comparative Study of Muscle Energy Technique and Dry Needling on Active Trigger Points of Quadratus Lumborum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v3i2.75Keywords:
Myofascial Trigger points, Muscle energy technique, Dry needling, Lower back pain treatment, Quadratus lumborum trigger points, Algometry assessmentAbstract
Background: The prevalence of chronic lower back pain has serious repercussions for the working population. Myofascial trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle are a substantial but sometimes ignored contributor to this pain. These trigger points form as a result of changing or increased muscle demands, acute or long-term strains on the lower back muscles, and so forth. Hyperirritable foci inside tense regions of hypertonic muscle tissue are what distinguish them. The well accepted manual therapy techniques such as dry needling and muscle energy method are used to deactivate trigger points and restore muscular balance to address this issue.
Objective: To determine the effects of muscle energy technique and dry needling of active trigger points of quadratus lumborum in lower back pain
Methods: There was a randomised controlled study. Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 subjects were chosen, divided into groups A and B. Digital algometer was used to measure the sensitivity of the trigger points. Group B underwent dry needling while Group A received the Muscle Energy Technique. Each patient received two sessions every week for three weeks. After the first, third, and sixth therapy sessions, the two groups were evaluated. Data was examined using SPSS version 21.
Results: Findings revealed that differences between two groups were statistically significant (p <0.05) and also statistically significant difference were observed within group analysis (p< 0.05) with respect to pain pressure threshold.
Conclusion: The study concluded that both Dry Needling and Muscle Energy Technique on trigger points were equally effective in increase pain pressure threshold in lower back pain.
Downloads
References
Tahir S, Akram S, Khan MYA, Taufiq A, Iqbal A, Anwar N. Comparative Effects of Stabilization Exercises and Muscle Energy Techniques on Pain and Disability in Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Pain. Polio Eradication from Pakistan. 2022;33(11):124.
da Silva T, Mills K, Brown BT, Pocovi N, de Campos T, Maher C, et al. Recurrence of low back pain is common: a prospective inception cohort study. Journal of physiotherapy. 2019;65(3):159-65.
Wang L, Pan Y, Ye X, Zhu Y, Lian Y, Zhang H, et al. Perirenal fat thickness and liver fat fraction are independent predictors of MetS in adults with overweight and obesity suspected with NAFLD: a retrospective study. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2023;15(1):56.
Pourahmadi M, reza Ayoubpour M, Firouze B. The effect of dry needling compared to lumbar spine mobilization on functional disability, pain, quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. 2023.
Al Matif S, Alfageer G, ALNasser N, Alabbas G, Al Sawidan H, ALhareth H. Effectiveness of muscle energy technique on pain intensity and disability in chronic low back patients: a systematic review. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2023;28(1):24.
Naransammy S. Dry needling versus intramuscular electrical stimulation on deltoid myofascial trigger points: University of Johannesburg (South Africa); 2019.
Sirh S-J, Sirh S-W, Mun H-Y, Sirh H-M. Importance of quadratus lumborum muscle trigger point injection and prolotherapy technique for lower back and buttock pain. Frontiers in Pain Research. 2022;3:997645.
Nugraha MHS, Antari N, Saraswati N. The efficacy of muscle energy technique in individuals with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review. Sport Fit J. 2020;8:91-8.
Funk MF, Frisina-Deyo AJ. Dry needling for spine related disorders: a scoping review. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 2020;28(1):1-13.
Palm B. Comparing the effectiveness of static myofascial dry needling versus fanning dry needling in the treatment of trapezius myofascial pain syndrome: University of Johannesburg (South Africa); 2012.
Montgomery RC. Static versus dynamic dry needling and the physiological response on local skin temperature due to changes in local blood flow: University of Johannesburg (South Africa); 2018.
Mirzaie H, Pourahmadi MR, reza Ayoubpour M. The effect of dry needling compared to lumbar spine mobilization on pain, functional disability, quadratus lumborum and lumbar multifidus function, lumbar range of motion and pain pressure threshold in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. 2022.
Akhtar H, Noor R, Khan AS, Saqib F, Saleem N, Waris S. Comparison of Dry Needling and Dry Cupping in Positional Fault of Pelvis Due to Myofascial Trigger Points in Quadratus Lumborum. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022;16(05):457-.
Stevans JM, Delitto A, Khoja SS, Patterson CG, Smith CN, Schneider MJ, et al. Risk factors associated with transition from acute to chronic low back pain in US patients seeking primary care. JAMA network open. 2021;4(2):e2037371-e.
Oshikawa T, Adachi G, Akuzawa H, Okubo Y, Kaneoka K. Coordinate activity of the quadratus lumborum posterior layer, lumbar multifidus, erector spinae, and gluteus medius during single-leg forward landing. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2021;61:102605.
Ahmed UA, Maharaj SS, Van Oosterwijck J. Effects of dynamic stabilization exercises and muscle energy technique on selected biopsychosocial outcomes for patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian journal of pain. 2021;21(3):495-511.
Porto GB, Jeffrey Wessell D, Alvarado A, Arnold PM, Buchholz AL. Anticoagulation and spine surgery. Global Spine Journal. 2020;10(1_suppl):53S-64S.
Nowak Z, Chęciński M, Nitecka-Buchta A, Bulanda S, Ilczuk-Rypuła D, Postek-Stefańska L, et al. Intramuscular Injections and Dry Needling within Masticatory Muscles in Management of Myofascial Pain. Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(18):9552.
Tesch RDS, Macedo LCDSP, Fernandes FS, De Goffredo Filho GS, Goes CPDQF. Effectiveness of dry needling on the local pressure pain threshold in patients with masticatory myofascial pain. Systematic review and preliminary clinical trial. CRANIO®. 2019.
Greenberg J. Muscle energy technique versus dry needling of quadratus lumborum in the treatment of myofascial trigger points: University of Johannesburg (South Africa); 2014.
Arias-Buría JL, Martín-Saborido C, Cleland J, Koppenhaver SL, Plaza-Manzano G, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of the inclusion of dry needling into an exercise program for subacromial pain syndrome: evidence from a randomized clinical trial. Pain Medicine. 2018;19(12):2336-47.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Komal Ahmed, Ghazal Hussain , Hafsa Khan, Hamna Zahid, Amena Batool
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.