Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic versus Open Varicocelectomy
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Varicocele, characterized by the dilation and swelling of testicular veins, significantly impacts male infertility and semen quality, affecting 10-15% of the male population. Surgical intervention is essential to alleviate these effects, with various techniques available, including laparoscopic and open subinguinal varicocelectomy.
Objective: This study aimed to compare postoperative complications between laparoscopic and open subinguinal varicocelectomy to determine the superior approach in terms of patient outcomes and complications.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted, involving 130 patients admitted to Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from November 10, 2021, to July 31, 2022. Participants, presenting with symptoms of scrotal heaviness, testicular swelling, pain, and infertility, were randomly assigned to either the laparoscopic (Group L, n=70) or open subinguinal (Group O, n=60) varicocelectomy groups. Preoperative assessments included medical history, clinical examination, and necessary tests. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Exclusion criteria included patients with malignancy, diabetes (BSR > 200 mg/dl), or unstable hemoglobin levels (Hb < 10 mg/dl). Postoperative complications, including wound erythema, hydrocele, epididymitis, and bruising, were documented and analyzed using SPSS version 25, with a significance level set at P ≤ 0.05.
Results: The mean age of Group L was 27.3 years (±2.3), and Group O was 25.2 years (±3.5) (P = 0.042). Postoperative complications were significantly lower in Group L compared to Group O. Wound erythema was observed in 1.42% of Group L and 8.3% of Group O (P = 0.05). Hydrocele occurred in 2.8% of Group L versus 10% of Group O (P = 0.04). Epididymitis was found in 1.42% of Group L and 6.5% of Group O (P = 0.03). Bruising was noted in 1.66% of Group O, with no cases in Group L (P = 0.05).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy resulted in fewer postoperative complications compared to open subinguinal varicocelectomy, making it the preferred surgical approach for varicocele treatment. Further studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are recommended to validate these findings.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Witt MA, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele: A Progressive or Static Lesion? Urol. 1993;59:613-6.
Zini A, Girardi SK, Goldstein M. Varicocele. In: Hellstrom WJG. Male Infertility and Sexual Dysfunction. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997;201-218.
El Gohary MA. Boyhood Varicocele: An Overlooked Disorder. Ann R Coll Surg Eng. 1984;66:36-8.
Bush JP, Cromie WJ. Evaluation and Treatment of the Preadolescent Varicocele. Urol Clin N Am. 1985;12(1):177-86.
Dudai M, Sayfan J, Mesholam J, Sperber Y. Laparoscopic Simultaneous Ligation of Internal and External Spermatic Veins for Varicocele. J Urol. 1995;153:704-5.
Tulloch WS. A Consideration of Sterility Factors in the Light of Subsequent Pregnancies. Edinburgh Med J. 1952;59:29-34.
Enquist E, Stein BS, Sigman M. Laparoscopic Versus Subinguinal Varicocelectomy: A Comparative Study. Fertil Steril. 1994;61(6):1092-6.
Hassan JM, Adams MC, Pope JC, Demarco RT, Brock JW. Hydrocele Formation Following Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy. J Urol. 2006;175:1076-9.
Aaberg RA, Vancaillie TG, Schuessler WW. Laparoscopic Varicocele Ligation: A New Technique. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(4):776-7.
Kocvara R, Dvoracek J, Sedlacek J, Dite Z, Novak K. Lymphatic Sparing Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy: A Microsurgical Repair. J Urol. 2005;173:1751-4.
Bebars GA, Zaki A, Dawood AR, El-Gohary MA. Laparoscopic Vs. Open Ligation of Testicular Vein for Treatment of Varicocele. JSLS. 2000;4:209-13.
Zini A, Azhar R, Baazeem A. Effect of Microsurgical Varicocelectomy on Human Sperm and DNA Integrity: A Prospective Trial. Int J Androl. 2011;34:14-9.
Winfield H, Donovan J. Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy. Sem Urol. 1992;10:152.
Cicigoi A, Bianchi M. Early Diagnosis and Current Treatment of Varicocele in Puberty. Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl. 1991;63(4):409-13.
Al Shareef ZH, Koneru SR, Al Tayeb A, Shehata ZM, Aly TF, Basyouni A. Laparoscopic Ligation of Varicocele: An Anatomically Superior Operation. Ann R Coll Surg Eng. 1993;75(5):345-8.
D'Agostini S, Musi L, Colombo B, Belloli GB. Varicocele: An Epidemiological Study and Indications for Treatment. Paed Med Chir. 1994;16(6):527-30.
Su LM, Goldstein M, Schlegel PN. The Effect of Varicocelectomy on Serum Testosterone Levels in Infertile Men with Varicocele. J Urol. 1995;154:1752-5.
Kocvara R, Dolezal J, Hamppl R. Division of the Lymphatic Vessel at Varicocelectomy Leads to Testicular Edema and Decline in Testicular Function According to the LH-RH Analog Stimulation Test. Eur Urol. 2003;43:430-5.
Cooper CS, Joudi FN, Williams RD. Urology. In: Doherty GM. Current Diagnosis and Treatment: Surgery. 13th Ed. USA: McGraw-Hill; 2010:902-65.
Tan SM, Ng FC, Ravintharan T, Lim PH, Chng HC. Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy: Technique and Results. Br J Urol. 1995;76(4):523-8.
Fuse H, Okumura A, Sakamoto M, Ohta S, Katayama T. Laparoscopic Varicocele Ligation. Int Urol Nephrol. 1996;28(1):91-7.
Misseri R, Gershbein AB, Horowitz M, Glassberg KI. The Adolescent Varicocele: The Incidence of Hydrocele and Delayed Recurrent Varicocele after Varicocelectomy in a Long-term Follow-up. BJU Int. 2001;87:494-8.