Relationship between Stigma, Psychological Flexibility, Positive and Negative Affect in Patients with Epilepsy

Authors

  • Shahida Darkhawasti Islamia University Bahawalpur Pakistan.
  • Amara Gul University of Haripur- Haripur- Pakistan.
  • Amina Bibi Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan.
  • Riffat Saleem Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan.
  • Fatima Khaliq Islamia University of Bahawalpur
  • Urooj Manzoor Government College University Faisalabad Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.1055

Keywords:

Epilepsy, Stigma, Psychological Flexibility, Positive Affect, Cognitive Fusion

Abstract

Background: Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that significantly impacts the daily lives of individuals, leading to psychological, social, and cognitive challenges. Despite advancements in its management, stigma remains a substantial issue for epilepsy patients.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between stigma, psychological flexibility, and positive and negative affect in patients with epilepsy.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 200 participants, with 100 epilepsy patients and 100 healthy individuals, aged 18 to 45 years, from four major cities in Punjab, Pakistan. Data were collected using convenience sampling. The instruments used were the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) inventory (epilepsy version), the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ), the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II), and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics summarized the demographic and clinical characteristics, and independent samples t-tests were used to compare the groups.

Results: Epilepsy patients had significantly higher levels of internalized stigma (ISMI total score: 84.05 ± 11.77) compared to healthy individuals (52.79 ± 13.67), t(198) = 17.33, p < 0.01. They also exhibited lower psychological flexibility (AAQ-II score: 39.23 ± 8.92 vs. 26.04 ± 10.07), t(198) = 9.81, p < 0.01, and higher cognitive fusion (CFQ score: 39.62 ± 9.19 vs. 27.56 ± 10.44), t(198) = 8.67, p < 0.01. Positive affect was lower in epilepsy patients (12.58 ± 4.13) compared to healthy individuals (15.30 ± 4.08), t(198) = 4.68, p < 0.01, while negative affect was higher (19.97 ± 4.51 vs. 14.89 ± 4.69), t(198) = -7.81, p < 0.01.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated significant relationships between stigma, psychological flexibility, and affect in epilepsy patients. Addressing these factors is crucial for improving the psychological well-being and quality of life for individuals with epilepsy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Shahida Darkhawasti, Islamia University Bahawalpur Pakistan.

Applied Psychologist, Islamia University Bahawalpur Pakistan.

Amara Gul, University of Haripur- Haripur- Pakistan.

Dean, University of Haripur- Haripur- Pakistan.

Amina Bibi, Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan.

Applied Psychologist, Islamia University Bahawalpur Pakistan.

Riffat Saleem, Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan.

Applied Psychologist, Islamia University Bahawalpur Pakistan.

Fatima Khaliq, Islamia University of Bahawalpur

Applied Psychologist, Islamia University Bahawalpur Pakistan.

Urooj Manzoor, Government College University Faisalabad Pakistan.

Government College University Faisalabad Pakistan.

References

Boyd JE, Otilingam PG, DeForge BR. Brief Version of the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) Scale: Psychometric Properties and Relationship to Depression, Self Esteem, Recovery Orientation, Empowerment, and Perceived Devaluation and Discrimination. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014;37(1):17-23.

Gillanders DT, Bolderston H, Bond FW, Dempster M, Flaxman PE, Campbell L, et al. The Development and Initial Validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Behav Ther. 2014;45(1):83-101.

Hayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson KG, Bissett RT, Pistorello J, Toarmino D, et al. Measuring Experiential Avoidance: A Preliminary Test of a Working Model. Psychol Rec. 2004;54:553-78.

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063-70.

Shorvon SD, Andermann F, Guerrini R. The Causes of Epilepsy: Common and Uncommon Causes in Adults and Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

Falco-Walter JJ, Scheffer IE, Fisher RS. The New Definition and Classification of Seizures and Epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;139:73-9.

Shorvon SD. The Etiologic Classification of Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011;52(6):1052-7.

Neligan A, Bell GS, Sander JW, Shorvon SD. How Refractory Is Refractory Epilepsy? Patterns of Relapse and Remission in People with Refractory Epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2011;96(3):225-30.

Ferrie CD, Smithson WH, Walker MC. Non-Drug Treatments Including Epilepsy Surgery. In: Engel J, Pedley TA, Aicardi J, editors. Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 1539-54.

Brodie MJ, Zuberi SM, Scheffer IE, Fisher RS. The 2017 ILAE Classification of Seizure Types and the Epilepsies: What Do People with Epilepsy and Their Caregivers Need to Know? Epileptic Disord. 2018;20(2):77-87.

Gurshaw M, Agalu A, Chanie T. Anti-Epileptic Drug Utilization and Treatment Outcome Among Epileptic Patients on Follow-Up in a Resource Poor Setting. J Young Pharm. 2014;6(3):47-52.

Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, Processes and Outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1-25.

Chida Y, Steptoe A. Positive Psychological Well-Being and Mortality: A Quantitative Review of Prospective Observational Studies. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(7):741-56.

Wolniewicz CA, Tiamiyu MF, Weeks JW, Elhai JD. Problematic Smartphone Use and Relations with Negative Affect, Fear of Missing Out, and Fear of Negative and Positive Evaluation. Psychiatry Res. 2018;262:618-23.

Räty LK, Söderfeldt BA, Larsson G, Larsson BM. The Relationship Between Illness Severity, Sociodemographic Factors, General Self-Concept, and Illness-Specific Attitude in Swedish Adolescents with Epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2004;13(6):375-82.

Hussey I, Barnes-Holmes D. The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Measure of Implicit Depression and the Role of Psychological Flexibility. Cogn Behav Pract. 2012;19(4):573-82.

Thurman DJ, Beghi E, Begley CE, Berg AT, Buchhalter JR, Ding D, et al. Standards for Epidemiologic Studies and Surveillance of Epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011;52(Suppl 7):2-26.

Tang V, Michaelis R, Kwan P. Psychobehavioral Therapy for Epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;32:147-55.

Leeman-Markowski BA, Schachter SC. Cognitive and Behavioral Interventions in Epilepsy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017;17(5):35.

Hayes SC. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Relational Frame Theory, and the Third Wave of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies. Behav Ther. 2004;35(4):639-65.

Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, et al. Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A Revised Measure of Psychological Inflexibility and Experiential Avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011;42(4):676-88.

Cullingham T, Kirkby A, Eccles FJ, Sellwood W. Psychological Inflexibility and Somatization in Nonepileptic Attack Disorder. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;111:107155.

Bagherzade A, Kataki SSH. Positive and Negative Affects and Coping Strategies in Patients with Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizure, Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and Control Groups. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2015;8(1):133-9.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-21

How to Cite

Darkhawasti, S., Amara Gul, Amina Bibi, Riffat Saleem, Fatima Khaliq, & Manzoor, U. (2024). Relationship between Stigma, Psychological Flexibility, Positive and Negative Affect in Patients with Epilepsy. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 4(2), 1597–1601. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.1055