Role of Endotrainers in Laparoscopic Surgical Training of Young Surgeons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.1780Keywords:
Laparoscopy Training, Endotrainers, Simulation-Based Learning, Surgical Education, Motor Skill Acquisition, Low-Cost Simulation, Surgical Residency TrainingAbstract
Background: Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred technique for many surgical procedures due to its minimal invasiveness and faster recovery, but effective training remains a challenge, especially in low-resource settings lacking formal simulation tools. There is a significant need to evaluate cost-effective alternatives, such as homemade endotrainers, to bridge the skill acquisition gap among surgical trainees. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of low-cost endotrainers in improving the laparoscopic skills—specifically peg transfer, ligating endoloop, intracorporeal knotting, and extracorporeal knotting—among postgraduate general surgical trainees over a one-month training period. Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted at Lahore General Hospital with a sample of 30 third- and fourth-year general surgery residents. Inclusion criteria were residency status and willingness to participate; exclusion criteria included prior advanced laparoscopic training. Performance was assessed pre- and post-training using timed skill tasks and failure rates, evaluated by blinded laparoscopic surgeons. Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board, with all procedures adhering to the Helsinki Declaration. Data were analyzed using SPSS v27, employing paired sample t-tests and McNemar’s test to assess improvements. Results: Statistically significant improvements were observed in mean task times: peg transfer (10.87 to 2.57 min, p=0.012), endoloop (12.75 to 7.50 min, p=0.015), intracorporeal knotting (7.13 to 2.10 min, p=0.049), and extracorporeal knotting (11.67 to 3.33 min, p=0.015). Task failure rates also declined notably. Clinically, trainees demonstrated enhanced coordination, efficiency, and safety. Conclusion: Cost-effective, homemade endotrainers significantly improve basic laparoscopic skills among surgical residents, supporting their integration into surgical training, especially in resource-limited environments to enhance procedural safety and patient outcomes.
Downloads
References
Arregui ME, Roberts J, Katkhouda N, McKernan JB, Reich H, editors. Principles of Laparoscopic Surgery: Basic and Advanced Techniques. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
Alfa-Wali M, Osaghae S. Practice, Training and Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9(1):13–21.
Soler L, Marescaux J. Virtual Surgical Simulation: The First Steps in a New Training. In: Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, editors. Simulation Training: Fundamentals and Applications. London: Future Healthcare Journal; 2016. p. 95–117.
Halls MC, Alseidi A, Berardi G, Cipriani F, Van der Poel M, Davila D, et al. A Comparison of the Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Liver Surgeons in Differing Stages of the IDEAL Paradigm of Surgical Innovation. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):221–8.
Patel HR, Linares A, Joseph JV. Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery: Cost and Training. Surg Oncol. 2009;18(3):242–6.
Ballantyne GH, Kelley WE. Granting Clinical Privileges for Telerobotic Surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12(1):17–25.
Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy for Patients With Symptomatic Cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD006231.
Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. One-Wound Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84(5):695–7.
Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P. Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Cholecystectomy: An Evolving Technique. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(3):709–14.
Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, Laycock R, Tesfay ST, Valentine RJ, et al. Laparoscopic Training on Bench Models: Better and More Cost Effective Than Operating Room Experience? J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(3):272–83.
Nguyen NT, Mayer KL, Bold RJ, Larson M, Foster S, Ho HS, et al. Laparoscopic Suturing Evaluation Among Surgical Residents. J Surg Res. 2000;93(1):133–6.
Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Introducing the Sitact LS 500 Laparoscopy Simulator: Toward a Revolution in Surgical Education. Surg Technol Int. 2003;11:32–6.
Roberts KE, Bell RL, Duffy AJ. Evolution of Surgical Skills Training. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(20):3219–24.
Vlaovic PD, McDougall EM. New Age Teaching: Beyond Didactics. Sci World J. 2006;6:2370–80.
Funch-Jensen P. Surgical Training. Dan Med Bull. 2008;55(2):128–30.
Sanchez-Santos R, Estevez S, Tome C, Gonzalez S, Brox A, et al. Training Programs Influence in the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: A Systematic Review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):34–41.
Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Simulation in Surgical Education. CMAJ. 2010;182(11):1191–6.
Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S. Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons in the Operating Room: A Review of the Literature. Surgery. 2006;139(2):140–9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Assam Arshid, Huda Jabbar, Khadija Shafiq, Khadija Shafiq, Mommna Komal Arshid, Bilal Masood
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Public Licensing Terms
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license:
- You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use.
- Attribution must be given to the original author(s) and source in a manner that is reasonable and does not imply endorsement.
- No additional restrictions may be applied that conflict with the terms of this license.
For more details, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
