Utilization and Perceived Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Services in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Physiotherapists

Authors

  • Rabia Majeed Assistant Professor, University of Management Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v6i1.1940

Keywords:

Assistant Professor, University of Management Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

Background: Telerehabilitation is increasingly used in musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy, yet clinician-level evidence on utilization, perceived effectiveness, and implementation barriers in low- and middle-income urban settings remains limited. Objective: To assess telerehabilitation utilization patterns, perceived clinical effectiveness, and predictors of high perceived effectiveness among physiotherapists managing MSK disorders in Lahore. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 510 physiotherapists was conducted using a structured questionnaire capturing demographics, telerehabilitation utilization, perceived effectiveness across clinical domains (Likert 1–5), implementation barriers, and contextual practice characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of high perceived effectiveness, reporting adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Overall, 68.2% reported ever using telerehabilitation and 54.9% used it in the past three months; weekly/daily use was 37.6%, and the median MSK share managed remotely was 22% (IQR 10–35). Perceived effectiveness was highest for patient education (4.18 ± 0.71; 83.5% agreement) and exercise adherence (4.02 ± 0.76; 78.6%), while shoulder assessment confidence was lowest (2.91 ± 0.88; 34.5%). The leading barriers were limited hands-on assessment (4.12 ± 0.73; 70.2% major barrier) and internet instability (3.89 ± 0.84; 61.0%). High perceived effectiveness was independently associated with prior training (AOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.68–3.46), weekly/daily use (AOR 2.98, 95% CI 2.01–4.41), and good internet quality (AOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.15–2.58). Conclusion: Telerehabilitation is widely utilized for MSK care in Lahore and is perceived as particularly effective for education and adherence support; however, assessment limitations and connectivity barriers remain central. Training and infrastructure strengthening may improve clinician-perceived effectiveness and implementation. Keywords: telerehabilitation; telehealth; musculoskeletal disorders; physiotherapy; perceived effectiveness; barriers; Pakistan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alahmri F, Nuhmani S, Muaidi Q. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation on pain and function in musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Musculoskeletal Care. 2024;22(2).

Amin J, Ahmad B, Amin S, Siddiqui AA, Alam M. Rehabilitation professional and patient satisfaction with telerehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. BioMed Res Int. 2022.

Ateeq A, Jahan N, Alam M, Khanum F. Role of telerehabilitation in musculoskeletal conditions during COVID-19 pandemic. Indian J Pain. 2020;34(3):217.

Bargeri S, Castellini G, Vitale JA, Guida S, Banfi G, Gianola S, et al. Effectiveness of telemedicine for musculoskeletal disorders: Umbrella review. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e50090.

Baroni MP, Jacob MFA, Rios WR, Fandim JV, Fernandes LG, Chaves PI, et al. The state of the art in telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions. Arch Physiother. 2023;13(1).

Bucki FM, Clay MB, Tobiczyk H, Green BN. Scoping review of telehealth for musculoskeletal disorders: Applications for the COVID-19 pandemic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021;44(7):558-65.

Chief Physiotherapist IYN, Research Consultant IYN, Research Mentor IYN, Consultant Physiotherapist IYN, Co-Founder IYN, Statistician IMDSBN. Telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Physiother Res. 2021.

Corso M, Cancelliere C, Mior S, Salmi LR, Cedraschi C, Nordin M, et al. Are nonpharmacologic interventions delivered through synchronous telehealth as effective and safe as in-person interventions for the management of patients with nonacute musculoskeletal conditions? A systematic rapid review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(1):145-54.e11.

Fiani B, Siddiqi I, Lee SC, Dhillon L. Telerehabilitation: Development, application, and need for increased usage in the COVID-19 era for patients with spinal pathology. Cureus. 2020.

Franco JB, Maximino LP, Secchi LLB, Antonelli BC, Blasca WQ. What are the barriers to telerehabilitation in the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases? Port J Public Health. 2023;42(1):33-42.

Janela D, Costa F, Weiss B, Areias A, Molinos M, Scheer J, et al. Effectiveness of biofeedback-assisted asynchronous telerehabilitation in musculoskeletal care: A systematic review. Digit Health. 2023.

Jirasakulsuk N, Saengpromma P, Khruakhorn S. Real-time telerehabilitation in older adults with musculoskeletal conditions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;9(3):e36028.

Krzyzaniak N, Cardona M, Peiris R, Michaleff ZA, Greenwood H, Clark J, et al. Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face rehabilitation in the management of musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Rev. 2023;28(2):71-87.

Moreira LdM, Silva APd, Scardovelli TA, Martini SC, Boschi SRMS. Telerehabilitation in musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Health Inform. 2025.

Muñoz-Tomás MT, Burillo-Lafuente M, Vicente-Parra A, Sanz-Rubio MC, Suarez-Serrano C, Marcén-Román Y, et al. Telerehabilitation as a therapeutic exercise tool versus face-to-face physiotherapy: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(5):4358.

Rennie K, Taylor C, Corriero A, Chong C, Sewell E, Hadley J, et al. The current accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and uses of musculoskeletal telehealth and telerehabilitation services. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2022.

Seron P, Oliveros M-J, Gutierrez-Arias R, Fuentes-Aspe R, Torres-Castro RC, Merino-Osorio C, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapy: A rapid overview. Phys Ther. 2021;101(6).

Suso-Martí L, La Touche R, Herranz-Gómez A, Angulo-Díaz-Parreño S, Paris-Alemany A, Cuenca-Martínez F. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapist practice: An umbrella and mapping review with meta–meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2021;101(5).

Tsang MP, Man GCW, Xin H, Chong YC, Ong MT-Y, Yung PS-H. The effectiveness of telerehabilitation in patients after total knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Telemed Telecare. 2022;30(5):795-808.

Wicks M, Dennett AM, Peiris CL. Physiotherapist-led, exercise-based telerehabilitation for older adults improves patient and health service outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2023;52(11).

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Rabia Majeed. (2026). Utilization and Perceived Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Services in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Physiotherapists. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v6i1.1940

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.