Comparison between Effectiveness of Mets and Static Stretching on Trapezius in Upper Cross Syndrome

Authors

  • Muhammad Kashif King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan.
  • Rahat Ayub University of Management and Technology Lahore Pakistan.
  • Sufyan Nawaz Islam Medical College Sialkot Pakistan.
  • Nimra Hanif Ali Clinic & maternity home Pakistan.
  • Aiman Shahzadi MARS Institute of Health Sciences Pakistan.
  • Baseer Ullah Cancer Care Hospital & Research Center Raiwand Lahore Pakistan.
  • Wirda Al-Razi Institute Pakistan.
  • Noor Fatima Al-Razi Institute Pakistan.
  • Mahnoor Asif University of the Punjab Lahore Pakistan.
  • Mahrukh Asif University of Management and Technology Lahore Pakistan.
  • Tooba Naveed Riphah International University Pakistan.
  • Atika Javed Riphah International University Pakistan.
  • Muniba Zubair LCWU Lahore Pakistan.
  • Bazal Rao UMT Lahore Pakistan.
  • Sania Maqbool Lahore College for Women University Lahore Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.841

Keywords:

Upper Cross Syndrome, Muscle Energy Techniques, Stretching Exercises, Neck Pain, Functional Status, Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index

Abstract

Background: Upper cross syndrome involves an imbalance between the muscles of the anterior and upper trunk and the posterior skeletal muscles, leading to postural and functional issues. Muscle Energy Techniques (METs) and stretching exercises are common interventions, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear.
Objective: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of METs and stretching in treating pain and improving functional status in patients with upper cross syndrome.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Physical Therapy Department of Mayo Hospital, Lahore, over six months. Sixty-two patients with upper cross syndrome were randomly assigned to two groups, each consisting of 31 participants. Group 1 received METs and conventional therapy, while Group 2 received static stretching and conventional therapy. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity, measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and functional status, assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). The intervention period lasted four weeks, and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.
Results: In Group 1, the pre-treatment VAS score was 7.41 (± 1.08), decreasing to 3.41 (± 1.11) post-treatment, while in Group 2, the VAS score dropped from 7.16 (± 1.50) to 4.87 (± 1.56). The pre-treatment NDI score in Group 1 was 40.19 (± 6.15), which improved to 32.51 (± 6.16) post-treatment. In Group 2, the NDI score improved from 40.06 (± 5.88) to 35.74 (± 5.82). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in pain and functional status, with METs showing greater effectiveness (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Muscle Energy Techniques were more effective in reducing pain and improving functional status in patients with upper cross syndrome compared to stretching exercises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Kashif, King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan.

King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan.

Rahat Ayub, University of Management and Technology Lahore Pakistan.

Assistant Professor, University of Management and Technology Lahore Pakistan.

Sufyan Nawaz, Islam Medical College Sialkot Pakistan.

Lecturer, Islam Medical College Sialkot Pakistan.

Nimra Hanif, Ali Clinic & maternity home Pakistan.

Ali Clinic & maternity home Pakistan.

Aiman Shahzadi, MARS Institute of Health Sciences Pakistan.

MARS Institute of Health Sciences Pakistan.

Baseer Ullah, Cancer Care Hospital & Research Center Raiwand Lahore Pakistan.

Cancer Care Hospital & Research Center Raiwand Lahore Pakistan.

Wirda, Al-Razi Institute Pakistan.

Al-Razi Institute Pakistan.

Noor Fatima, Al-Razi Institute Pakistan.

Al-Razi Institute Pakistan.

Mahnoor Asif, University of the Punjab Lahore Pakistan.

MPhil. Public Health, Institute of Social & Cultural Sciences, University of the Punjab Lahore Pakistan.

Mahrukh Asif, University of Management and Technology Lahore Pakistan.

University of Management and Technology Lahore Pakistan.

Tooba Naveed, Riphah International University Pakistan.

Riphah International University Pakistan.

Atika Javed, Riphah International University Pakistan.

Riphah International University Pakistan.

Muniba Zubair, LCWU Lahore Pakistan.

LCWU Lahore Pakistan.

Bazal Rao, UMT Lahore Pakistan.

UMT Lahore Pakistan.

Sania Maqbool, Lahore College for Women University Lahore Pakistan.

Lecturer, Department of Physical Therapy, Lahore College for Women University Lahore Pakistan.

References

Seidi F, Bayattork M, Minoonejad H, Andersen LL, Page PJSr. Comprehensive corrective exercise program improves alignment, muscle activation and movement pattern of men with upper crossed syndrome: randomized controlled trial. 2020;10(1):20688.

Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically oriented anatomy: Wolters kluwer india Pvt Ltd; 2018.

Jonas R, Wilke H-J. The cervical spine. Biomechanics of the Spine: Elsevier; 2018. p. 11-34.

Mujawar JC, Sagar JH. Prevalence of Upper Cross Syndrome in Laundry Workers. Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2019;23(1):54-6.

Arshadi R, Ghasemi GA, Samadi HJPTiS. Effects of an 8-week selective corrective exercises program on electromyography activity of scapular and neck muscles in persons with upper crossed syndrome: Randomized controlled trial. 2019;37:113-9.

Roshani S, Yousefi M, Sokhtezari Z, Khalil Khodaparast MJJoRS, Research. The effect of a corrective exercise program on upper crossed syndrome in a blind person. 2019;6(3):148-52.

Rajalaxmi V, Paul J, Nithya M, Lekha SC, Likitha BJRJoP, Technology. Effectiveness of three dimensional approach of schroth method and yoga on pulmonary function test and posture in upper crossed syndrome with neck Pain-A double blinded study. 2018;11(5):1835-9.

Singla D, Veqar ZJJocm. Association between forward head, rounded shoulders, and increased thoracic kyphosis: a review of the literature. 2017;16(3):220-9.

Fadaei T, Shamsi Majelan A, Daneshmandi HJفد-نتف. The effect of a selected corrective program on upper Crossed Syndrome in men with depression. 2022;12(3):0-.

Azam H, Fatima N, Asjad A, Ashraf I, Asif T, Rehman FJPBJ. Comparative Effects of Comprehensive Corrective Exercises Versus Muscle Energy Techniques in Patients with Upper Cross Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Corrective Exercises Vs Muscle Energy Techniques in Patients with Upper Cross Syndrome. 2022:173-7.

Risalda P, Phansopkar P, Naqvi WMJIJoFM, Toxicology. Effectiveness of active release technique verses conventional physiotherapy in management of upper cross syndrome. 2021;15(1):246-50.

Idan Almasoodi MC, Mahdavinejad R, Ghasmi GJSRiP. The Effect of 8 Weeks National Academy of Sports Medicine Exercises Training on Posture, Shoulder Pain, and Functional Disability in Male with Upper Cross Syndrome. 2020;11(11).

Waheed N, Muhammad A, Rabia N, Sumaira N, Raza ZSWJB, Journal PR. Effectiveness of cervical manual mobilization techniques versus stretching exercises for pain relief in the management of neck pain. 2021;12(3):261-4.

Fatima A, Ashraf HS, Sohail M, Akram S, Khan M, Azam HJAJoAHS. PREVALENCE OF UPPER CROSS SYNDROME AND ASSOCIATED POSTURAL DEVIATIONS IN COMPUTER OPERATORS; A QUALITATIVE STUDY. 2022;7(3).

Gillani S, Rehman S, Masood TJJotPMA. Effects of eccentric muscle energy technique versus static stretching exercises in the management of cervical dysfunction in upper cross syndrome: a randomized control trial. 2020;70(3):1.

DENIZ MA, Evren K, ERCAN M, YAĞAR D, Serkan Ö, ÖZBAĞ DJTFvRD. COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY AND MULLIGAN MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUE IN THE TREATMENT OF CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE.33(2):13-22.

Sadria G, Hosseini M, Rezasoltani A, Bagheban AA, Davari A, Seifolahi AJJob, et al. A comparison of the effect of the active release and muscle energy techniques on the latent trigger points of the upper trapezius. 2017;21(4):920-5.

Gilani MHZ, Obaid S, Tariq MJIMJ. Comparison between effectiveness of ischemic compression and muscle energy technique in upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. 2018;10:230-4.

Sbardella S, La Russa C, Bernetti A, Mangone M, Guarnera A, Pezzi L, et al., editors. Muscle energy technique in the rehabilitative treatment for acute and chronic non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Healthcare; 2021: MDPI.

Ayubi MZ, Pristianto A. Efektivitas Muscle Energy Technique dan Static Stretching terhadap Keluhan Myofascial Pain Syndrome Otot Upper Trapezius pada Pekerja Batik Laweyan Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta; 2017.

Ali S, Ahmad S, Jalal Y, Shah BJJRCoRS. Effectiveness of Stretching Exercises Versus Muscle Energy Techniques in the Management of Upper Cross Syndrome: JRCRS. 2017; 5 (1): 12-16. 2017;5(1):12-6.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-07

How to Cite

Kashif, M., Ayub, R., Nawaz, S., Hanif, N., Shahzadi, A., Ullah, B., Wirda, Fatima, N., Asif, M., Asif, M., Naveed, T., Javed, A., Zubair, M., Rao, B., & Maqbool, S. (2024). Comparison between Effectiveness of Mets and Static Stretching on Trapezius in Upper Cross Syndrome. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 4(2), 525–530. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.841

Most read articles by the same author(s)