Comparison of Intensive Physical Therapy and Electrical Stimulation to Reduce Spasticity in Stroke
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.552Keywords:
Stroke Rehabilitation, Spasticity, Intensive Physical Therapy, Electrical Stimulation, Modified Ashworth Scale, Quasi-Experimental Trial, Post-Stroke RecoveryAbstract
Background: Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, often resulting in spasticity that significantly impairs the functional recovery of individuals. The comparative efficacy of intensive physical therapy and electrical stimulation in mitigating post-stroke spasticity remains a critical area of research. Understanding the impacts of these treatments can guide clinicians in optimizing rehabilitation strategies for stroke survivors.
Objective: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intensive physical therapy and electrical stimulation in reducing spasticity among stroke patients, with an emphasis on how these interventions influence muscle tone and functional outcomes.
Methods: This quasi-experimental trial was conducted at Nishtar Hospital, Multan, over six months, involving 30 participants aged 50-65 years who had experienced a stroke. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either intensive physical therapy or electrical stimulation. Baseline and post-treatment assessments of spasticity were conducted using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25, focusing on changes in MAS scores before and after the interventions.
Results: Both interventions showed significant improvements in spasticity levels. The intensive physical therapy group exhibited notable reductions in MAS scores across various joints: shoulder flexors (from 3.13 ± 0.51 to 1.20 ± 0.41), shoulder extensors (from 3.00 ± 0.65 to 1.20 ± 0.67), and hip abduction (from 3.00 ± 0.65 to 1.33 ± 0.72). The electrical stimulation group also demonstrated significant improvements, with MAS scores in wrist flexion (from 2.73 ± 0.70 to 1.33 ± 0.61) and hip extension (from 2.80 ± 0.67 to 1.26 ± 0.45) showing notable reductions. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of overall effectiveness in reducing spasticity (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Both intensive physical therapy and electrical stimulation are effective in reducing post-stroke spasticity, with no significant difference in their overall efficacy. This suggests that either treatment can be considered as part of a comprehensive rehabilitation strategy for stroke survivors, depending on individual patient needs, preferences, and specific functional goals.
Downloads
References
Le Danseur MJCCNC. Stroke rehabilitation. 2020;32(1):97-108.
Martins E, Cordovil R, Oliveira R, Letras S, Lourenço S, Pereira I, et al. Efficacy of suit therapy on functioning in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. 2016;58(4):348-60.
Al-Sadawi M, Mohamadpour M, Zhyvotovska A, Ahmad T, Schechter J, Soliman Y, et al. Cerebrovascular accident and snake envenomation: a scoping study. International journal of clinical research & trials. 2019;4.
Andersen LL, Zeeman P, Jørgensen JR, Bech-Pedersen DT, Sørensen J, Kjær M, et al. Effects of intensive physical rehabilitation on neuromuscular adaptations in adults with poststroke hemiparesis. 2011;25(10):2808-17.
Stein C, Fritsch CG, Robinson C, Sbruzzi G, Plentz RDMJS. Effects of electrical stimulation in spastic muscles after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 2015;46(8):2197-205.
Stein C, Fritsch CG, Robinson C, Sbruzzi G, Plentz RDM. Effects of electrical stimulation in spastic muscles after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2197-205.
Balch MH, Harris H, Chugh D, Gnyawali S, Rink C, Nimjee SM, et al. Ischemic stroke-induced polyaxonal innervation at the neuromuscular junction is attenuated by robot-assisted mechanical therapy. Experimental Neurology. 2021;343:113767.
Kawashima N, Popovic MR, Zivanovic V. Effect of intensive functional electrical stimulation therapy on upper-limb motor recovery after stroke: case study of a patient with chronic stroke. Physiotherapy Canada. 2013;65(1):20-8.
Berampu S, Brampu IS, Jehaman I. PENGARUH PEMBERIAN FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION (FES) TERHADAP SKALA NYERI SUBLUKSASI SHOULDER PADA PASIEN POST STROKE DI RUMAH SAKIT GRANDMED LUBUK PAKAM. JURNAL KEPERAWATAN DAN FISIOTERAPI (JKF). 2021;3(2):180-5.
Johnston KC, Bruno A, Pauls Q, Hall CE, Barrett KM, Barsan W, et al. Intensive vs standard treatment of hyperglycemia and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke: the SHINE randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2019;322(4):326-35.
Mahmood A, Veluswamy SK, Hombali A, Mullick A, Manikandan N, Solomon JM. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on spasticity in adults with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2019;100(4):751-68.
Marques-Sule E, Arnal-Gómez A, Buitrago-Jiménez G, Suso-Martí L, Cuenca-Martínez F, Espí-López GV. Effectiveness of Nintendo Wii and physical therapy in functionality, balance, and daily activities in chronic stroke patients. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2021;22(5):1073-80.
Wissel J, Schelosky LD, Scott J, Christe W, Faiss JH, Mueller J. Early development of spasticity following stroke: a prospective, observational trial. Journal of neurology. 2010;257(7):1067-72.
Suputtitada A, Chatromyen S, Chen CP, Simpson DM. Best Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Post-stroke Spasticity: A Modified Scoping Review. Toxins. 2024 Feb;16(2):98.
Roman N, Miclaus RS, Necula R, Dumistracel A, Cheregi C, Grigorescu OD. Physiotherapy Efficiency in Post-stroke Upper Extremity Spasticity: TENS vs. Ultrasound vs. Paraffin. in vivo. 2023 Mar 1;37(2):916-23.
Marsden J, Stevenson V, Jarrett L. Treatment of spasticity. InHandbook of Clinical Neurology 2023 Jan 1 (Vol. 196, pp. 497-521). Elsevier.
Fawaz SI, Izumi SI, Zaki AS, Eldiasty SE, Saadawy A, Saber HG, Gadallah MF, Labib HS. Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for improving upper limb function in post-stroke hemiparesis. Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation. 2023 Oct 10;50(1):35.
Zhang Y, Zhang X, Cheng C, Huang S, Hua Y, Hu J, Wang Y, Zhang W, Yang Y, Liu Y, Jia J. Mirror therapy combined with contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for the upper limb motor function after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2023 Jun 20:1-7.
Ramirez-Nava AG, Mercado-Gutierrez JA, Quinzaños-Fresnedo J, Toledo-Peral C, Vega-Martinez G, Gutierrez MI, Gutiérrez-Martínez J. Functional electrical stimulation therapy controlled by a P300-based brain–computer interface, as a therapeutic alternative for upper limb motor function recovery in chronic post-stroke patients. A non-randomized pilot study. Frontiers in Neurology. 2023 Aug 17;14:1221160.
Work HM. What is it, causes of spasticity, prevention and treatment. A method for treating spastic muscle conditions after a stroke How to remove muscle tone after a stroke. Nutrition. 2023 Feb 21;17:43.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Azfar Khurshid, Syed Ali Hussain, Muhammad Ahmed Saleemi, Zainab Hassan, Mian Maaz Badshah, Suffain Khalid, Noman Khar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
