Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.796Keywords:
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Chronic Total Occlusion, Coronary Arteries, Patient Outcomes, Cardiac RevascularizationAbstract
Background: Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) of coronary arteries presents a significant challenge in the management of coronary artery disease (CAD), influencing treatment outcomes and patient prognosis. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) are two predominant revascularization strategies employed, each offering distinct benefits and limitations.
Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PCI and CABG in managing patients with CTO, to inform clinical decision-making and optimize treatment approaches.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023. We included 145 patients diagnosed with CTO who underwent PCI (n=65) or CABG (n=80). Data were collected on patient demographics, clinical features, lesion characteristics, procedural details, and follow-up outcomes. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) and quality of life measures were the primary endpoints. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, employing Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results: The procedural success rate was 84.6% for PCI and 90% for CABG. MACE occurred in 23.1% of the PCI group and 15% of the CABG group. The average hospitalization duration was 5.8 days for PCI and 8.5 days for CABG. Quality of life assessments showed comparable scores between groups, with PCI scoring 80.6 on the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and CABG scoring 79.8.
Conclusion: PCI and CABG demonstrated similar efficacy and safety profiles in the management of CTO, underscoring the need for individualized treatment strategies based on patient-specific factors. Both methods proved viable, with slightly higher procedural success in CABG and comparable quality of life outcomes.
Downloads
References
Kearney K, Hira RS, Riley RF, Kalyanasundaram A, Lombardi WL. Update on the Management of Chronic Total Occlusions in Coronary Artery Disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017 Apr;19:1-0.
Hoe J. CT Coronary Angiography of Chronic Total Occlusions of the Coronary Arteries: How to Recognize and Evaluate and Usefulness for Planning Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Apr;25(Suppl 1):43-54.
Opolski MP, Gransar H, Lu Y, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah MH, Andreini D, Bax JJ, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Callister TQ. Prognostic Value of Chronic Total Occlusions Detected on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography. Heart. 2019 Feb 1;105(3):196-203.
Opolski MP, Ó Hartaigh B, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Andreini D, Cademartiri F, Chang HJ, Chinnaiyan K, Chow BJ. Current Trends in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusions Undergoing Coronary CT Angiography. Heart. 2015 Aug 1;101(15):1212-8.
Brinkmann C, Eitan A, Schwencke C, Mathey DG, Schofer J. Rotational Atherectomy in CTO Lesions: Too Risky? Outcome of Rotational Atherectomy in CTO Lesions Compared to Non-CTO Lesions. EuroIntervention. 2018 Dec 7;14(11):e1192-8.
Nguyen TN, Santoso T, Kao HL, Munawar M, Tuan NQ. Interventions in Patients after CABG. In Practical Handbook of Advanced Interventional Cardiology: Tips and Tricks, Third Edition. 2009 Apr 8 (pp. 240-259).
Escaned J. Secondary Revascularization After CABG Surgery. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2012 Sep;9(9):540-9.
Werner N, Nickenig G, Sinning JM. Complex PCI Procedures: Challenges for the Interventional Cardiologist. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Aug;107:64-73.
Karatasakis A, Danek BA, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, Vo M, Carlino M, Patel MP, Rinfret S, Brilakis ES. Approach to CTO Intervention: Overview of Techniques. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Jan;19:1-7.
Patel VG, Brayton KM, Tamayo A, Mogabgab O, Michael TT, Lo N, Alomar M, Shorrock D, Cipher D, Abdullah S, Banerjee S. Angiographic Success and Procedural Complications in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Interventions: A Weighted Meta-Analysis of 18,061 Patients from 65 Studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;6(2):128-36.
Abdallah MS, Wang K, Magnuson EA, Spertus JA, Farkouh ME, Fuster V, Cohen DJ; FREEDOM Trial Investigators. Quality of Life After PCI Vs CABG Among Patients with Diabetes and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2013 Oct 16;310(15):1581-90.
Writing Committee Members, Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, DiMaio JM, Don CW. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):e21-129.
Sabatine MS, Bergmark BA, Murphy SA, T O'Gara P, Smith PK, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Park SJ, Park DW, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. The Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2247-57.
Shah R, Clare RM, Chiswell K, Jones WS, Kumar AS, Thiele H, Smalling RW, Chandra P, Cohen M, Perera D, Chew DP. Impact of Non-Infarct-Related Artery Disease on Infarct Size and Outcomes (From the CRISP-AMI Trial). Am J Med. 2016 Dec 1;129(12):1307-15.
Shoaib A, Kinnaird T, Curzen N, Kontopantelis E, Ludman P, de Belder M, Rashid M, Kwok CS, Nolan J, Zaman A, Mamas MA. Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov;11(11):e006824.
Gharacholou SM, Munoz FD, Motiei A, Sandhu GS, Barsness GW, Gulati R, Wright RS, Pellikka PA, Lewis B, Johnson MP, Lane GE. Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2020 Nov 15;135:1-8.
Wilson SJ, Hanratty CG, Spence MS, Owens CG, Rigger J, Spratt JC, Walsh SJ. Saphenous Vein Graft Sacrifice Following Native Vessel PCI Is Safe and Associated with Favourable Longer-Term Outcomes. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):1048-52.
Hartley A, Nijjer S. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Patient Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Interventions. 2022 Oct 15:233-48.
Araiza-Garaygordobil D, Gopar-Nieto R, Cabello-López A, Martinez-Amezcua P, Eid-Lidt G, Baeza-Herrera LA, Gonzalez-Pacheco H, Briseño-De la Cruz JL, Martinez DS, Mendoza-García S, Altamirano-Castillo A. Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Vs Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Results from a Study in Mexico City. CJC Open. 2021 Apr 1;3(4):409-18.
Wang C, Liu S, Kamronbek R, Ni S, Cheng Y, Yan H, Zhang M. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 2023 Nov 6;2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anwar Jamal Khan, Jabar Ali , Shoaib Iqbal Safi, Wasim Sajjad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
