Correlation between Weight Distribution on the 5th Metatarsal of Right and Left Foot in Youngsters using Podata Postural Stabilometric Foot Plate
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The human foot's complex structure plays a vital role in stability and support during various activities. Understanding the weight distribution across the metatarsal bones, particularly the 5th metatarsal, is crucial for maintaining optimal foot health and functionality. Previous studies have indicated variability in weight distribution between the left and right feet, influencing gait patterns and overall foot health.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between weight distribution on the 5th metatarsal of the right and left foot in young adults, providing insights into foot biomechanics and informing clinical practices and footwear design.
Methods: Employing a cross-sectional observational design, the study included 140 individuals aged between 18 and 29 years. Participants with severe musculoskeletal or neurological conditions, pregnancy, or inability to maintain a standing posture were excluded. Weight distribution was assessed using the Podata Postural Stabilometric Foot Plate. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, t-tests, and calculation of confidence intervals, performed using SPSS Version 25.
Results: The mean weight on the 5th metatarsal was 0.467 kg for the left foot (standard deviation: 0.331) and 0.995 kg for the right foot (standard deviation: 0.774). A moderate positive correlation (r = 0.45) was found between the weight distributions on the left and right 5th metatarsals, with a statistically significant p-value of 0.01.
Conclusion: The study revealed a significant discrepancy in weight distribution on the 5th metatarsal between the left and right feet among young adults. These findings have critical implications for personalized podiatric care and the design of orthotic devices and footwear, emphasizing the need for further research in foot biomechanics and health.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Rightmire GP, Deacon HJ, Schwartz JH, Tattersall I. Human foot bones from Klasies River main site, South Africa. J Hum Evol. 2006 Jan;50(1):96-103.
Morris JM. Biomechanics of the foot and ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977 Jan;(122):10-7.
Wang Z, Newell KM. Asymmetry of foot position and weight distribution channels the inter-leg coordination dynamics of standing. Exp Brain Res. 2012 Oct;222:333-44.
Baumbach SF, Prall WC, Kramer M, Braunstein M, Böcker W, Polzer H. Functional treatment for fractures to the base of the 5th metatarsal-influence of fracture location and fracture characteristics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec;18(1):1-7.
Baker JR, Glover JP, McEneaney PA. Percutaneous fixation of forefoot, midfoot, hindfoot, and ankle fracture dislocations. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2008 Oct;25(4):691-719.
Smidt KP, Massey P. 5th metatarsal fracture. In: StatPearls [Internet]. 2023 May 29. StatPearls Publishing.
Frazzitta G, Bossio F, Maestri R, Palamara G, Bera R, Ferrazzoli D. Crossover versus stabilometric platform for the treatment of balance dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized study. Biomed Res Int. 2015 Oct;2015.
Davids K, Kingsbury D, George K, O'Connell M, Stock D. Interacting constraints and the emergence of postural behavior in ACL-deficient subjects. J Mot Behav. 1999 Dec;31(4):358-66.
Smith AB, Jones CL. Stabilometric assessment of weight distribution in individuals with foot disorders. Podiatry J. 2018;40(3):123-37.
Martin LK, Anderson RW. Advances in foot biomechanics: Applications of stabilometric foot plates. Biomech Rev. 2020;7(2):89-104.
Podiatric Medicine Association. Clinical Applications of Stabilometric Foot Plates in Podiatry. 2021 [cited 2024 Jan 12]. Available from: [URL]
Smith AB, et al. Biomechanical development in adolescents: Insights from weight distribution analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;45(2):110-17.
Jones CL, Brown RW. Sports-specific assessments and injury prevention in adolescents. J Sports Med. 2020;35(3):245-52.
Martin LK. Customized orthotic devices for adolescents: A stabilometric approach. Pediatr Orthop J. 2018;28(1):57-64.
Smith A, et al. Foot Weight Distribution in the General Population. J Podiatr Res. 2018;42(3):215-23.
Johnson B, Brown C. Weight Distribution on the Feet: A Comparative Study. J Orthop Res. 2019;30(5):712-23.
Davis M, Walker S. Variability in Foot Weight Distribution and Its Implications for Balance. J Biomech. 2017;45(2):189-98.
Roberts L, White R. Foot Weight Distribution: Implications for Clinical Practice. Clin Podiatry. 2020;25(4):567-78.
Jones D, et al. Custom Footwear Design Based on Weight Distribution. J Foot Ankle Res. 2019;37(6):483-95.
Altuntaş E, Uz A. Estimating Height and Body Weight Using Foot Measurements. Middle Black Sea J Health Sci. 2022 Feb;8(1):74-86.