Frequency of Complications among Trauma Patients Treated by Traditional Bone Setters Presented to Orthopedics Department, Gujranwala Teaching Hospital Gujranwala.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v3i2.132Keywords:
Complications, Cross-Sectional Study, Orthopedics, Traditional Bone Setters, Trauma Patients, Treatment Outcomes, Unconventional MedicineAbstract
Background: Traditional bone setters (TBS) are widely consulted for trauma care in developing regions, often leading to severe complications due to inadequate medical knowledge. This practice poses significant risks to patient safety and outcomes.
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the frequency and nature of complications encountered by trauma patients treated by traditional bone setters.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery at Gujranwala Teaching Hospital, Pakistan, from February 1st to April 31st. Ninety-seven patients who received care from TBS and subsequently presented at the Orthopedic outpatient clinic were included. Detailed data on demographics, injury type and site, TBS management techniques, and resulting complications were collected and analyzed using SPSS Version 20.
Results: Among the 97 patients, 63 (64.95%) were female and 34 (35.05%) were male, with ages ranging from 3 to 70 years and a mean age of 33. TBS primarily used sticks and bandages for fracture management. The most common complications were malunion (42.27%), non-union (21%), and joint stiffness (17%).
Conclusion: The high incidence of complications from TBS treatments significantly strains the Orthopedics department. Proposed solutions include integrating TBS into the healthcare system for improved training and regulation or implementing a complete ban on their malpractices.
Downloads
References
Garikapati V, Konadu-Yeboah D, Mengesha MG, Marenah K, Harrison W. Systematic review of complications associated with treatment by traditional bone setters for musculoskeletal injury. Tropical Doctor. 2023;53(1):13-9.
Onyemaechi NO, Menson WNA, Goodman X, Slinkard S, Onwujekwe OE, Enweani UN, et al. Complications of traditional bonesetting in contemporary fracture care in low‐and middle‐income countries: A systematic review. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2021;26(11):1367-77.
Ogunlusi J, Popoola S, Yusuf M, Wuraola O, Olasinde A, Oluwadiya K. Complications arising from paediatric trauma, infection and deformity managed by Traditional Bone Setters in South Western Nigeria.
Ogunlusi J, Okem IC, Oginni L. Why patients patronize traditional bone setters. Internet J Orthop Surg. 2007;4(2):1-7.
Nwachukwu BU, Okwesili IC, Harris MB, Katz JN. Traditional bonesetters and contemporary orthopaedic fracture care in a developing nation: historical aspects, contemporary status and future directions. Open Orthop J. 2011;5:20-6.
Card EB, Obayemi JE, Shirima O, Lazaro M, Massawe H, Stanifer JW, et al. Practices and perspectives of traditional bone setters in northern Tanzania. Annals of Global Health. 2020;86(1).
Memon FA, Saeed G, Fazal B, Bhutto I, Laghari M, Siddique KA, et al. Complications of fracture treatment by traditional bone setters at Hyderabad. J Pak Ortho Asso. 2009;21(2):58-64.
Ali R, Tunio ZH, Ali SM, Baloch RA, Jokhio MF, Maher IK. Traditional Bone Setter’s Practice, Complications; Even in 21st Century. Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences. 2020;19(04):247-51.
Dada A, Giwa S, Yinusa W, Ugbeye M, Gbadegesin S. Complications of treatment of musculoskeletal injuries by bone setters. West African Journal of Medicine. 2009;28(1).
Worku N, Tewelde T, Abdissa B, Merga H. Preference of Traditional Bone Setting and associated factors among trauma patients with fracture at Black Lion Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: institution based cross sectional study. BMC Research Notes. 2019;12:1-6.
Omololu A, Ogunlade S, Gopaldasani V. The practice of traditional bonesetting: training algorithm. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2008;466(10):2392-8.
Zulfiqar Z, Bubak ZS, Jahangir A, Ali Z. Frequency of complications among trauma patients treated by traditional bone setters. JSZMC. 2018;9(3):1456-8.
Soomro ZI, Abbasi AN, Shah KA, Khatri KK, editors. Disastrous Effects of Fracture Treatment by Traditional Bone Setters. Med Forum; 2018.
Odatuwa-Omagbemi DO, Adiki TO, Elachi CI, Bafor A. Complications of traditional bone setters (TBS) treatment of musculoskeletal injuries: experience in a private setting in Warri, South-South Nigeria. Pan African Medical Journal. 2018;30(1).
Chika AT, Onyekwelu J. Traditional bone setters' gangrene: An avoidable catastrophe, 8 years retrospective review in a private orthopedic and trauma center in South-East Nigeria. The Nigerian Journal of General Practice. 2016;14(1):1.
Alam W, Shah FA, Ahmed A, Ahmad S, Shah A. Traditional bonesetters: frequency of complications with treatment by traditional bonesetter. The Professional Medical Journal. 2016;23(06):699-704.
Abang IE, Asuquo J, Ngim N, Ikpeme IA, Agweye P, Urom S, et al. Reasons for patronage of traditional bone setters. Nigerian Journal of Surgery. 2016;22(2):102-6.
Odatuwa-Omagbemi DO, Enemudo RE, Enamine SE, Esezobor EE. Traditional bone setting in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine. 2014;23(2):157-61.
Eze KC. Complications and co-morbidities in radiographs of patients in traditional bone setters’ homes in Ogwa, Edo State, Nigeria: a community-based study. European Journal of radiology. 2012;81(9):2323-8.
Ekere AU, Echem RC. Complications of fracture and dislocation treatment by traditional bone setters: a private practice experience. Nigerian Health Journal. 2011;11(2):59-66.
Solomon L, Warwick D, Nayagam S. Apley's system of orthopaedics and fractures: CRC press; 2010.
Idris SA, Mohammed OB, Basheer ES. Why do people prefer traditional bonesetters in Sudan? Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2010;5(3):199-206.
Bhatti A. Broken bones and bone setters. Medical channel. 2010;16(1):7-9.
Onuminya JE. The role of the traditional bonesetter in primary fracture care in Nigeria. S Afr Med J. 2004;94(8):652-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Asif Yousaf, Muhammad Saadatullah, Syed Ahtisham Anjam Gilani, Naeem Hussain , Syed Asif Ali Shah, Tayyab Shoaib, Mohammad Nauman Shahid, Sameer Ahmed, Muhammad Ahmed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Public Licensing Terms
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license:
- You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use.
- Attribution must be given to the original author(s) and source in a manner that is reasonable and does not imply endorsement.
- No additional restrictions may be applied that conflict with the terms of this license.
For more details, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
