Language Development in Children with Cochlear Implant using Bimodal Approach: SLP Perspective

Main Article Content

Mahrukh Rashid
Muhammad Ahmed
Muhammad Azzam Khan
Saffa Nawaz
Muhammad Sikander Ghayas Khan
Fahad Masood
Amna Rashid

Abstract

Background: The development of language skills in children with cochlear implants is a vital area of research, particularly in understanding the impact of the bimodal approach. This study focuses on children with early language delays under the age of five, exploring how cochlear implantation and the bimodal approach influence their language development.


Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the bimodal approach (cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid) on language development in children with cochlear implants. The study aimed to understand the perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) on the challenges and successes associated with this approach.


Methods: This descriptive study involved 50 SLPs from hospitals and rehabilitation centers across Pakistan, each with at least a year of clinical experience. Data were collected through a questionnaire focusing on various aspects of cochlear implantation and the bimodal approach. The questionnaire included questions on the age of implantation, additional medical complexities, effectiveness of the bimodal approach, and the impact on speech skills, social interaction, and cognitive functions. The study employed a cross-sectional design, and the data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 for statistical significance.


Results: The majority (81.2%) of children received their cochlear implantation between 1-3 years. About 70.6% of respondents reported using a second hearing aid post-implantation. The bimodal approach was found effective by 78.4% of therapists in aiding speech comprehension. Approximately 88.2% believed that hearing devices improved speech skills, and 82.4% noted the benefit of an additional hearing aid. However, concerns were raised about potential dependencies on these devices. In terms of social and academic performance, 84.4% of therapists saw improvements.


Conclusion: The study concludes that the bimodal approach is effective in enhancing language development in children with cochlear implants. Early implantation, combined with the use of a hearing aid, shows promising results in language acquisition and social interaction. Despite the limitations due to a small sample size and data collection constraints during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study provides valuable insights into the positive impact of the bimodal approach in language development.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rashid, M., Ahmed , M., Khan , M. A., Nawaz , S., Khan, M. S. G., Masood, F., & Rashid , A. (2023). Language Development in Children with Cochlear Implant using Bimodal Approach: SLP Perspective. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 3(2), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v3i2.81
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Mahrukh Rashid, NUR International University Lahore Pakistan.

Speech and Language Pathologist.

Muhammad Ahmed , The University of Lahore- Lahore Pakistan.

Assistant Professor.

Muhammad Azzam Khan , The University of Lahore- Lahore Pakistan.

Lecturer, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences.

Saffa Nawaz , The University of Lahore- Lahore Pakistan.

Lecturer, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences.

Muhammad Sikander Ghayas Khan, The University of Lahore- Lahore Pakistan.

Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences.

Fahad Masood, The University of Lahore- Lahore Pakistan.

Senior Lecturer, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences.

Amna Rashid , The University of Lahore- Lahore Pakistan.

Assistant Professor, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences.

References

Chitgar ER, Ghorbani A, Abasi S, Mohamadi R, Rasouli M. Pragmatic Skills in Children with Cochlear Implants. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2022.

Glade R, Taylor E, Culbertson DS, Ray C. Overview of current approaches to aural rehabilitation for adults with cochlear implants. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 2020;5(5):1175-87.

Achena A, Achena F, Dragonetti AG, Sechi S, Pili AW, Locci MC, et al. Cochlear Implant Evolving Indications: Our Outcomes in Adult Patients. Audiology Research. 2022;12(4):414-22.

Browning LM, Nie Y, Rout A, Heiner M. Audiologists’ preferences in programming cochlear implants: A preliminary report. Cochlear Implants International. 2020;21(4):179-91.

Rinaldi P, Pavani F, Caselli MC. Developmental, cognitive, and neurocognitive perspectives on language development in children who use cochlear implants. The Oxford handbook of deaf studies in learning and cognition. 2020:33-45.

Rødvik AK. Speech sound confusions in wellperforming adults and children with cochlear implants, measured by repetition of mono-and bisyllabic nonsense words. 2020.

Sahoo L, Kumari A, Patnaik U, Dwivedi G. Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation During Covid-19 Pandemic: A Parents’ Perspective. 2020.

Salehomoum M. Cochlear implant nonuse: Insight from deaf adults. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2020;25(3):270-82.

Van Bogaert L, Machart L, Gerber S, Lœvenbruck H, Vilain A, Costa M, et al. Speech rehabilitation in children with cochlear implants using a multisensory (French Cued Speech) or a hearing-focused (Auditory Verbal Therapy) approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2023;17:165.

Walker CA. Choosing a Language Modality: The Lived Experiences of Parents of Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants: Concordia University Chicago; 2023.

Sanzo K. Benefits of visual language: How acquisition of signed language complements spoken language development. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups. 2022;7(2):418-25.

Embry K, Page C, Ofori-Sanzo K. The fundamental framework for Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing children: a model from the child’s perspective. Journal of Child Language Acquisition and Development-JCLAD. 2023:759-75.

Greene A, Clark D, Ramos GM, Wimberly MB. Deaf Adults’ View of having Speech Language Therapy in Early Schooling. JADARA. 2023;55(2):1-15.

Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, Shearer T, Walkem K, Young S, et al. Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing. 2020;25(8):652-61.

Alkhamra R, Al-Omari HM, Hani HAB. Reliability and validity assessment of a survey: Measuring satisfaction with cochlear implant rehabilitation services for children in Jordan. PloS one. 2023;18(12):e0295939.

Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS: McGraw-hill education (UK); 2020.

Estabrooks W, Morrison H, MacIver-Lux K. Auditory–verbal therapy: An overview. Auditory–verbal therapy: Science, research, and practice. 2020:3-34.

Binos P, Nirgianaki E, Psillas G. How effective is auditory–verbal therapy (AVT) for building language development of children with cochlear implants? A systematic review. Life. 2021;11(3):239.

Mandal JC, Chatterjee I, Kumar S, Chakraborty S. Efficacy of Auditory Verbal Therapy on Listening and Linguistic Skills of a Child with Bimodal Hearing. Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery. 2020;28(3):277-81.

Carlyon RP, Goehring T. Cochlear implant research and development in the twenty-first century: a critical update. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. 2021;22(5):481-508.

Völter C, Götze L, Haubitz I, Müther J, Dazert S, Thomas JP. Impact of cochlear implantation on neurocognitive subdomains in adult cochlear implant recipients. Audiology and Neurotology. 2021;26(4):236-45.

Nieto I, Navas JF, Vázquez C. The quality of research on mental health related to the COVID-19 pandemic: a note of caution after a systematic review. Brain, behavior, & immunity-health. 2020;7:100123.

Most read articles by the same author(s)