Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comprehensive Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v3i2.235Keywords:
Constipation, Laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy, Laparoscopic suture rectopexy, Rectal prolapse, Recurrence rate, Recovery time, Surgical interventionAbstract
Background: Rectal prolapse, a debilitating condition, often requires surgical intervention. Laparoscopic techniques, such as posterior mesh rectopexy and suture rectopexy, have been increasingly employed due to their minimally invasive nature. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these procedures in treating rectal prolapse, focusing on long-term recurrence rates, postoperative recovery, and operative factors.
Objective: To assess the effects of laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy and laparoscopic suture rectopexy on patients with rectal prolapse, particularly regarding long-term recurrence rates, postoperative recovery, and operational aspects.
Methods: The study involved 14 patients with rectal prolapse, of whom 12 underwent laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy and 2 underwent laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Key factors such as the duration of hospital stay, necessity of blood transfusions during the procedure, and changes in constipation status were recorded. A mean follow-up duration of 94 months (7.83 years) was used to evaluate recurrence rates.
Results: The average operating time for the laparoscopic procedures was 120 minutes, with no intraoperative blood transfusions required. Postoperatively, 28.57% of patients reported improvement in constipation, 21.42% experienced no change, and 35.71% saw a worsening of symptoms. Notably, no recurrences of rectal prolapse were observed during the follow-up period. The average hospital stay was four days.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy and laparoscopic suture rectopexy are effective and safe in the treatment of rectal prolapse. They demonstrate promising results in terms of operative characteristics, recovery time, and long-term recurrence rates. The findings support the use of these laparoscopic techniques as viable surgical options for rectal prolapse, with positive implications for long-term patient outcomes and constipation management.
Downloads
References
Gallo G, Martellucci J, Pellino G, Ghiselli R, Infantino A, Pucciani F, et al. Management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse: Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22(12):919–931.
Bordeianou L, Paquette I, Johnson E, Holubar SD, Gaertner W, Feingold DL, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(11):1121–1131.
Emile SH, Elbanna H, Youssef M, Thabet W, Omar W, Elshobaky A, et al. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19(1):50–57.
Naldini G, et al. Complex pelvic organ prolapse: decision-making algorithm. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019.
Geltzeiler CB, et al. Combined rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy is safe for correction of pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018.
Abou Khalil M, Boutros M. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of fecal incontinence. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2022;7:19.
Kwakye G, Maguire LH. Anorectal Physiology Testing for Prolapse-What Tests are Necessary? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021;34(1):15–21.
Gallo G, Trompetto M. Complete rectal prolapse: still a lot of work to do. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(4):287–288.
Bordeianou L, Paquette I, Johnson E, Holubar SD, Gaertner W, Feingold DL, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Rectal Prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(11):1121–1131.
Kumar N, Kumar D. Fecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019;38(6):465–469.
Fu CW, Stevenson AR. Risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(2):178–186.
Trompetto M, Tutino R, Realis Luc A, Novelli E, Gallo G, Clerico G, et al. Altemeier’s procedure for complete rectal prolapse; outcome and function in 43 consecutive female patients. BMC Surg. 2019 Dec;19(1):1-7.
Tabiri S, COVIDSurg Collaborative. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans.
Spinelli A, Pellino G. COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives on an unfolding crisis. Journal of British Surgery. 2020 Jun;107(7):785-7.
Gallo G, Trompetto M, Realis Luc A, Novelli E, De Paola G, Clerico G, et al. Anatomo-functional outcomes of the laparoscopic Frykman–Goldberg procedure for rectal prolapse in a tertiary referral centre. Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1819-28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mukarram Mustajab , Saddam Hussain, Muhammad Ibrahim Shuja , Sumayya Sahar , Waleed Shaukat , Muhammad Ali, Ajmal Khan , Sadeeq Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Public Licensing Terms
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Under this license:
- You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use.
- Attribution must be given to the original author(s) and source in a manner that is reasonable and does not imply endorsement.
- No additional restrictions may be applied that conflict with the terms of this license.
For more details, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
